charles haule vs republic 2018 tzca 274 11 may 2018

charles haule vs republic 2018 tzca 274 11 may 2018

The defects in the notice of appeal, including omission and misstatement of relevant statutory provisions, rendered the notice invalid and the appeal incompetent under Rule 68(2) of the Rules.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
charles haule vs republic 2018 tzca 274 11 may 2018
Parties
Appellant: Charles Haule; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection at Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Defective Notice of Appeal, Requirements of Notice of Appeal, Rape, Unnatural Offence, Jurisdictional Competence
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Defective Notice of Appeal Requirements of Notice of Appeal Rape Unnatural Offence Jurisdictional Competence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Haule

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection at Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appeal was fatally defective for failure to cite proper provisions of law
  2. 2 Whether the defects in the notice of appeal rendered the appeal incompetent

Ratio Decidendi

The defects in the notice of appeal, including omission and misstatement of relevant statutory provisions, rendered the notice invalid and the appeal incompetent under Rule 68(2) of the Rules.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out for being incompetent due to a defective notice of appeal.