charles kisora chacha mzambia 3 others vs benjamin nyagetango 8 others 2024 tzhc 143 7 february 2024
Amendment of pleadings after a scheduling order is permissible only if it is necessary in the interests of justice. The court found the intended amendment would assist in the dispensation of justice and therefore vacated the previous scheduling order and allowed the amendment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- charles kisora chacha mzambia 3 others vs benjamin nyagetango 8 others 2024 tzhc 143 7 february 2024
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Charles Kisora Chacha @ Mzambia; Plaintiff: Kirambo Gomere Chacha; Plaintiff: Timasi Mwita Gomere; Plaintiff: Gomere Ryoba Gomere; Defendant: Benjamin Nyagetango; Defendant: Peter Range; Defendant: Chacha Roso; Defendant: Mwita Mwita Nyagutwi; Defendant: Mahanga Timasi Mahanga; Defendant: Matiko Samson Nkororo; Defendant: Matiko Zakaria Nkororo; Defendant: John Mwita Muhere; Defendant: Nyanswi John Nyamhanga
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Written Statement of Defence After Scheduling Order
- Outcome
- Application to amend written statement of defence allowed; scheduling order vacated.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Scheduling Order, Interests of Justice
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Kisora Chacha @ Mzambia
Plaintiff
Kirambo Gomere Chacha
Plaintiff
Timasi Mwita Gomere
Plaintiff
Gomere Ryoba Gomere
Plaintiff
Benjamin Nyagetango
Defendant
Peter Range
Defendant
Chacha Roso
Defendant
Mwita Mwita Nyagutwi
Defendant
Mahanga Timasi Mahanga
Defendant
Matiko Samson Nkororo
Defendant
Matiko Zakaria Nkororo
Defendant
John Mwita Muhere
Defendant
Nyanswi John Nyamhanga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Written Statement of Defence After Scheduling Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendment of the written statement of defence can be allowed after a scheduling order has been made
Ratio Decidendi
Amendment of pleadings after a scheduling order is permissible only if it is necessary in the interests of justice. The court found the intended amendment would assist in the dispensation of justice and therefore vacated the previous scheduling order and allowed the amendment.
Court Disposition
Application to amend written statement of defence allowed; scheduling order vacated.
Orders
- Leave granted for defendants to amend written statement of defence within 30 days from the date of ruling.
- Costs of adjournment of Tsh.200,000/= to be paid to defendants before filing the intended amendments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment