19940310 TZHC Dar es Salaam

19940310 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The appeal is allowed because the previous suit was not finally decided at the time the Magistrate dismissed the present suit; therefore, the bar of res judicata did not apply. The Magistrate should have stayed the suit under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Code, not dismissed it as res judicata.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
19940310 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Parties
Appellant: Charles Moses; Appellant: Paulo Meela; Appellant: Joseph Musitti; Respondent: Registrar of Buildings; Respondent: K.M. Rogathe
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 March 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Stay of Suit, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Res Judicata Stay of Suit Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Moses

Appellant

Paulo Meela

Appellant

Joseph Musitti

Appellant

Registrar of Buildings

Respondent

K.M. Rogathe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the suit was barred by res judicata
  2. 2 Whether the Principal Resident Magistrate erred in dismissing the suit as res judicata while an appeal was pending

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is allowed because the previous suit was not finally decided at the time the Magistrate dismissed the present suit; therefore, the bar of res judicata did not apply. The Magistrate should have stayed the suit under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Code, not dismissed it as res judicata.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Suit struck off by the Principal Resident Magistrate to be restored.
  • No order as to costs.