charles moses vs shamte khatibu 2008 tzhc 233 20 february 2008

charles moses vs shamte khatibu 2008 tzhc 233 20 february 2008

The applicant was not notified of the dismissal order and only became aware of it after the time to apply for setting aside had expired; this constitutes sufficient cause to grant extension of time.

Citation
charles moses vs shamte khatibu 2008 tzhc 233 20 february 2008
Parties
Applicant: Charles Moses; Respondent: Shamte Khatibu
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 February 2008
Procedural Posture
PC Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Dismissal of Appeal, Restoration of Appeal
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Moses

Applicant

Shamte Khatibu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

PC Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Set Aside Dismissal Order

  1. 1 Whether lack of notice of hearing constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time to set aside dismissal order
  2. 2 Whether lack of awareness of the dismissal order constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was not notified of the dismissal order and only became aware of it after the time to apply for setting aside had expired; this constitutes sufficient cause to grant extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant to file application for restoration of appeal within two weeks from the date of ruling