Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

charles moses vs principal secretary ministry of education vocation training another 2012 tzhc 196 27 november 2012

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The suit was struck out with costs due to persistent non-appearance of both parties and failure to prosecute, without determination of preliminary objections or dismissal on merits.

Court disposition

Suit struck out with costs

Orders

  • Suit struck out from court records
  • Parties to be notified

02

Material facts

Parties

Charles Moses

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Masaka

Principal Secretary Ministry of Education Vocation Training

1st Defendant

Attorney General

2nd Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Land Case / Ruling on Withdrawal and Preliminary Objections

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff sought to withdraw the suit with liberty to file afresh due to defects in the plaint.
Respondent
Defendants raised preliminary objections: no cause of action against 1st and 3rd Defendants, amended plaint filed to pre-empt objections, and suit is time barred.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Civil Procedure Code

    Court may strike out a suit for want of prosecution or non-appearance of parties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The suit was struck out with costs due to persistent non-appearance of both parties and failure to prosecute, without determination of preliminary objections or dismissal on merits.

Obiter and limits

  • Court noted intention not to dismiss the suit but to strike it out, allowing for possible refiling.

Court disposition

Suit struck out with costs

  • Suit struck out from court records
  • Parties to be notified

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 27 November 2012

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 27 November 2012

charles moses vs principal secretary ministry of education vocation training another 2012 tzhc 196 27 november 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)

AT DAR ES SALAAM LAND CASE NO. 242 OF 2006

CHARLES MOSES PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION VOCATION TRAINING .... 1st DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL........................ 2nd DEFENDANT

RULING A.F. Ngwala,J. On 21/05/2009 the Plaintiff, through the services of Mr. Masaka, learned advocate made and oral application that this suit be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh suit. The reason for withdraw being that there are some defeats on the Plaint which can be cured by way of filing a fresh suit. Because there were Preliminary Objections against the Plaintiffs suit this court made a finding that it would deal with the Preliminary Objections before entertaining the application for withdrawal. Before necessary orders could be made the parties have never entered appearance to the Court. The case has been adjourned several times and the parties have not shown reasons for non-' appearance. For avoidance of doubt, the 1st and 3rd Defendants raised their Preliminary Objection on Point of Law that the Plaintiff l has no cause of action against the 1st and 3rd Defendants. They also raised an Objection that the Amended Plaint filed in Court meant to pre- empty the Preliminary Objections. The second Defendant raised his Preliminary Objection that the suit is time barred. Before the Court could hear the Preliminary Objections the parties ceased to appear in Court. What the Court can now do is to expunge this suit from court records. With no intention to dismiss the suit. Accordingly, I struck out the same with costs. A.F. Ngwala, JUDGE, 27/11/2012. Delivered in Court this 27th day of November, 2012 A.F. Ngwala, JUDGE, 27/11/2012. 27/11/2012. Coram , A.F. Ngwala,J. For Plaintiff Absent For Defendant Absent Court: Parties to be notified. A.F. Ngwala, JUDGE, 27/11/2012.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.