charles nyakuti vs maloda msonjela 2017 tzhc 2189 17 august 2017

charles nyakuti vs maloda msonjela 2017 tzhc 2189 17 august 2017

The applicant failed to show good and sufficient cause for delay, as the law does not require a copy of the judgment to be annexed to the petition of appeal, and he delayed six months after the judgment was available.

Citation
charles nyakuti vs maloda msonjela 2017 tzhc 2189 17 august 2017
Parties
Applicant: Charles Nyakuti; Respondent: Maloda Msonjela
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
17 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Misc. Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Land Disputes Tribunal Procedure
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Land Disputes Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Nyakuti

Applicant

Maloda Msonjela

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal against the decision of the District Land and Housing Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show good and sufficient cause for delay, as the law does not require a copy of the judgment to be annexed to the petition of appeal, and he delayed six months after the judgment was available.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs.