chela kilasa vs republic 2010 tzca 112 11 october 2010
The omission by the trial court to draw a memorandum of matters not in dispute during the preliminary hearing contravened the mandatory requirements of section 192(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, quashing the proceedings is unnecessary; the defect can be remedied by ordering the trial court to draw up the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- chela kilasa vs republic 2010 tzca 112 11 october 2010
- Parties
- Applicant: Chela Kilasa; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Application for Revision of Preliminary Hearing Proceedings
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Hearing, Memorandum of Matters Not in Dispute, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chela Kilasa
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Application for Revision of Preliminary Hearing Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to draw a memorandum of matters not in dispute during preliminary hearing contravenes section 192(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act
- 2 Whether such omission occasions a failure of justice and requires quashing of proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The omission by the trial court to draw a memorandum of matters not in dispute during the preliminary hearing contravened the mandatory requirements of section 192(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, quashing the proceedings is unnecessary; the defect can be remedied by ordering the trial court to draw up the required memorandum from the existing record.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The trial court is ordered to draw a memorandum of matters not in dispute from the proceedings conducted on 4th June 2004.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment