chodawu vs ngorongoro conservation area authority 2023 tzhc 16935 28 april 2023
No evidence was provided by the applicant to show that a paramilitary scheme was being implemented in breach of the settlement; Deputy Registrar was justified in not making a specific order for execution as the respondent remained committed to the settlement.
- Citation
- chodawu vs ngorongoro conservation area authority 2023 tzhc 16935 28 april 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: CHODAWU; Respondent: Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Settlement Award, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Paramilitary Scheme Initiation Policy
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHODAWU
Applicant
Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar was justified in not making a specific execution order
- 2 Whether the execution application was premature and not executable
- 3 Whether the Deputy Registrar adjudged existence of paramilitary scheme without evidence or took judicial notice improperly
Ratio Decidendi
No evidence was provided by the applicant to show that a paramilitary scheme was being implemented in breach of the settlement; Deputy Registrar was justified in not making a specific order for execution as the respondent remained committed to the settlement.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment