Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

emmanuel michael kanyandege another v chrissostom christopher kaijage 2022 tzhccomd 48 25 march 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court is mandated to record and enforce a lawful settlement agreement reached by the parties, thereby disposing of the suit in accordance with the agreed terms.

Court disposition

Petition settled by consent; suit disposed of on agreed terms.

Orders

  • Petitioners to give respondent a company asset (printer type colour Laser jet Pro MFP dw) valued at TZS 15,000,000.00 to TZS 17,000,000.00.
  • Petitioners to give respondent MD complete table and chair in the office.
  • Petitioners to pay respondent cash of TZS 15,000,000.00 in two installments: TZS 7,500,000.00 by 30th March, 2022 and TZS 7,500,000.00 by 15th April, 2022.
  • Upon completion of first installment and handing over property, parties to schedule date to sign Brela forms and amicable handover.
  • In case of default, respondent may institute execution proceedings with interest to recover dues.

02

Material facts

Parties

Emmanuel Michael Kanyandege

Petitioner Counsel: Issa Chundo

Rehema Issa Chingomanje

Petitioner Counsel: Issa Chundo

Chrisostom Christopher Kaijage

Respondent Counsel: Denis Mwesiga

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Printer Asset: TZS 15,000,000
  • Value of Printer Asset (upper Range): TZS 17,000,000
  • Cash Payment (total): TZS 15,000,000
  • First Installment: TZS 7,500,000
  • Second Installment: TZS 7,500,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Misc Commercial Cause / Consent Judgment After Settlement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The respondent's actions and omissions were unlawful and unfairly prejudicial to the interests of the company and the petitioners as shareholders, warranting relief including purchase of respondent's shares and compensation.
Respondent
Parties agreed to settle the matter amicably and filed a deed of settlement outlining terms for resolution.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]; Motor Vessel Speideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others, Civil Application No 237 of 2013

    Where there is a lawful agreement or compromise, the court is bound to record a settlement once it is arrived at by the parties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court is mandated to record and enforce a lawful settlement agreement reached by the parties, thereby disposing of the suit in accordance with the agreed terms.

Obiter and limits

  • A consent decree is not appealable when the agreement relates to the whole suit.

Court disposition

Petition settled by consent; suit disposed of on agreed terms.

  • Petitioners to give respondent a company asset (printer type colour Laser jet Pro MFP dw) valued at TZS 15,000,000.00 to TZS 17,000,000.00.
  • Petitioners to give respondent MD complete table and chair in the office.
  • Petitioners to pay respondent cash of TZS 15,000,000.00 in two installments: TZS 7,500,000.00 by 30th March, 2022 and TZS 7,500,000.00 by 15th April, 2022.
  • Upon completion of first installment and handing over property, parties to schedule date to sign Brela forms and amicable handover.
  • In case of default, respondent may institute execution proceedings with interest to recover dues.

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 25 March 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 25 March 2022

emmanuel michael kanyandege another v chrissostom christopher kaijage 2022 tzhccomd 48 25 march 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

AT PAR ES SALAAM MISC COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO. 01 OF 2022 IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 2002 AND IN THE MATTER OF SAFE COMPUTERS ICT & SERVICES PROVIDERS

TANZANIA LIMITED AND

IN THE MATTER OF PETITION FOR ORDERS ON GROUND OF UNFAIR

PREJUDICE BY

BETWEEN EMMANUEL MICHAEL KANYANDEGE..................................... 1st PETITIONER REHEMA ISSA CHINGOMANJE............................................... 2nd PETITIONER AND CHRISOSTOM CHRISTOPHER KAIJAGE...................................... RESPONDENT Date of Last Order and Judgement: 25/03/2022

CONSENT JUDGEMENT MAGOIGA, J. The petitioners, EMMANUEL MICHAEL KANYANDEGE AND REHEMA ISSA CHINGOMANJE by way of petition, instituted the instant petition against the above- named respondent, praying for decree in the following orders, namely: --Uk i i) A declaration order that the respondent's actions/conducts and omissions were and are unlawful and unfairly prejudicial to the interest of the company and the Petitioners as shareholder of the company; ii) An order that the petitioners to purchase of all shares of the respondent in the company; iii) An order for the respondent to pay general to the petitioners as the court may asses; iv) Costs of this petition be borne by the respondent; and v) Any other relief or orders as the court may deem fit and just to grant. When this petition was called on for hearing on 7th March, 2022, Mr. Issa Chundo learned advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Denis Mwesiga, learned advocate for the respondent informed the court, they are ready for hearing but before I deliver the ruling/judgement they intend to settle this matter amicably. I heard parties and scheduled the matter today for ruling or recording settlement. When this petition was called today, Mr. Chundo for petitioners and holding brief for Mwesiga told the court parties managed to settle the matter and deed of settlement has already filed in this court today on 24th March, 2022. The

learned counsel for parties prayed that the same be recorded and a decree be issue as decree of the court on the terms and conditions agreed. I have gone through the Deed of Settlement filed in this court by the parties and indeed filed under order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R. E. 2019]. The said Rule 3 which provides that:- 2 "Where defendant satisfies the plaintiff in respect of the whole or any part of the subject matter of the suit, the court shall order such agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded and shall pass decree in accordance therewith so far it relates to the suit". This provision was defined by Mulla, the Code of Civil Procedure Act of 1908 (14th edition) on page 1828, who stated that: "The rule gives a mandate to, the court to record a lawful adjustment or compromise and pass a decree on in terms of such compromise and such consent decree is not appealable when the agreement relates to whole suit. The court on being invited by the parties record the agreement and pass a decree in accordance with the agreement and the suits ends there". This position was acknowledged by the Court of Appeal in the case of Motor Vessel Speideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others Civil application No 237 of 2013 (unreported) in which the Court of observed that: "Where there is lawful agreement or compromise the court is bound to

record a settlement once it is arrived at by the parties." I have examined the deed of settlement which seeks to settle the whole petition once and for all. Therefore, by a deed of settlement dully executed by the parties in this 3 petition and filed in this court, this court hereby record this to be settled out of court in the terms and conditions as agreed in the deed of settlement under Order XXII Rule 3 of the Civil procedure Code in the following words: 1. The petitioners has agreed to give the respondent on asset in the company that is a printer type colour Laser jet Pro MFP dw aound TZS. 15,000,000.00 to TZS. 17,000,000.00; 2. MD complete table and chair in the office and; 3. Cash of TZS. 15,000,000.00. This amount is payable in two installments that is TZS.7,500,000.00 by 30th March, 2022 and the balance of TZS.7,500,000.00 shall be paid on or before 15th April, 2022; 4. Upon completion of the first installment and handing over the property agreed above to the respondent, all parties shall schedule a date to sign Brela forms and an amicable hand over; 5. In case of default in the terms of this settlement agreed herein above, the respondent shall have the right to institute execution proceedings with interest thereto to recover his dues. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam on this 25th

JUDGE 25/3/2022 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Motor Vessel Speideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others, Civil Application No 237 of 2013

Case cited

Companies Act, 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Code [Cap 33 R.E. 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.