christian orgenes nkya vs republic 2020 tzca 173 26 march 2020

christian orgenes nkya vs republic 2020 tzca 173 26 march 2020

Applicant accounted for delay and indicated intended review is based on manifest error; this suffices for good cause under Rule 10. Substantive grounds for review need not be detailed at extension stage.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
christian orgenes nkya vs republic 2020 tzca 173 26 march 2020
Parties
Applicant: Christian Orgenes Nkya; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Appellate Decision, Manifest Error
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Appellate Decision Manifest Error

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christian Orgenes Nkya

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file an application for review
  2. 2 Whether the applicant must substantiate grounds for review at the extension stage

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant accounted for delay and indicated intended review is based on manifest error; this suffices for good cause under Rule 10. Substantive grounds for review need not be detailed at extension stage.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted extension of time to file application for review within sixty days from date of ruling