19820211 TZHC Mbeya

The appeal was filed more than ninety days after the required period without any explanation for the delay, making it time-barred under the Criminal Procedure Code.

Citation: 19820211 TZHC Mbeya
Parties: Appellant: Christome Stephen Ulthuliop; Respondent: The Republic
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 11 February 1982
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Appellate
Outcome: Appeal struck out as time-barred
Legal Topics: Stealing by Servant, Forgery, Limitation Periods, Appeal Procedure
Source Language: English

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Stealing by Servant Forgery Limitation Periods Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Christome Stephen Ulthuliop

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appellate

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory limitation period
2 Whether there was sufficient reason to extend the limitation period for filing the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was filed more than ninety days after the required period without any explanation for the delay, making it time-barred under the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as time-barred

Orders

The appeal is declared time-barred and is struck out.