benyoma v united republic of tanzania application no 0012016 2019 afchpr 35 26 september 2019

benyoma v united republic of tanzania application no 0012016 2019 afchpr 35 26 september 2019

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice, the proceedings should be re-opened and the Respondent State’s late response to reparations submissions should be accepted and served on the Applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
benyoma v united republic of tanzania application no 0012016 2019 afchpr 35 26 september 2019
Parties
Applicant: Chrizostom Benyoma; Respondent: United Republic of Tanzania
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Application / Order on Re Opening of Pleadings
Outcome
Proceedings re-opened; Respondent State’s response accepted
Legal Topics
Right to Equal Protection Before the Law, Right to Be Heard, Reparations, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Human Rights Law Right to Equal Protection Before the Law Right to Be Heard Reparations Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chrizostom Benyoma

Applicant

United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Application / Order on Re Opening of Pleadings

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent State violated the Applicant’s right to equal protection before the law
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant was denied the right to be heard during trial and appeals
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent State’s late response to reparations submissions should be accepted

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice, the proceedings should be re-opened and the Respondent State’s late response to reparations submissions should be accepted and served on the Applicant.

Court Disposition

Proceedings re-opened; Respondent State’s response accepted

Orders

  • Proceedings in Application No. 001/2016 are re-opened
  • Respondent State’s Response to reparations submissions is deemed duly filed and to be served on the Applicant