19770812 TZHC Mwanza

19770812 TZHC Mwanza

The supplement to the will was not a forgery but a genuine document dictated and signed by the deceased, corroborated by witness testimony. It did not revoke or alter the original will or infringe on the respondent's inheritance. Under the law, supplements (codicils) to a will are permissible.

Citation
19770812 TZHC Mwanza
Parties
Appellant: Clemence Bolukeki; Appellant: Felista Kimwotni; Respondent: Anthony
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
12 August 1977
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Validity of Will, Codicil to Will, Revocation of Will, Forgery Allegations
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clemence Bolukeki

Appellant

Felista Kimwotni

Appellant

Anthony

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the supplement to the will was a forgery
  2. 2 Whether a supplement (codicil) can lawfully be added to a will under Bahaya Customary Law
  3. 3 Whether the supplement revoked or altered the original will

Ratio Decidendi

The supplement to the will was not a forgery but a genuine document dictated and signed by the deceased, corroborated by witness testimony. It did not revoke or alter the original will or infringe on the respondent's inheritance. Under the law, supplements (codicils) to a will are permissible.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • The decision of the district court is set aside.
  • The respondent is to bear the costs in all three courts.