19770812 TZHC Mwanza
The supplement to the will was not a forgery but a genuine document dictated and signed by the deceased, corroborated by witness testimony. It did not revoke or alter the original will or infringe on the respondent's inheritance. Under the law, supplements (codicils) to a will are permissible.
- Citation
- 19770812 TZHC Mwanza
- Parties
- Appellant: Clemence Bolukeki; Appellant: Felista Kimwotni; Respondent: Anthony
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Codicil to Will, Revocation of Will, Forgery Allegations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clemence Bolukeki
Appellant
Felista Kimwotni
Appellant
Anthony
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the supplement to the will was a forgery
- 2 Whether a supplement (codicil) can lawfully be added to a will under Bahaya Customary Law
- 3 Whether the supplement revoked or altered the original will
Ratio Decidendi
The supplement to the will was not a forgery but a genuine document dictated and signed by the deceased, corroborated by witness testimony. It did not revoke or alter the original will or infringe on the respondent's inheritance. Under the law, supplements (codicils) to a will are permissible.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The decision of the district court is set aside.
- The respondent is to bear the costs in all three courts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment