Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

Selina Kokutona Ruling

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The committal proceedings were fatally defective due to non-compliance with Section 246(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and conflict of interest between accused persons, necessitating recommittal and separate legal representation.

Court disposition

Committal proceedings nullified; recommittal ordered; adjournment granted

Orders

  • Adjournment of hearing granted
  • Committal proceedings by Bukoba District Court nullified and expunged
  • Bukoba District Court ordered to conduct recommittal in full compliance with Section 246(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act
  • Order to be complied with within 14 days
  • Accused to be represented by different advocates
  • Preliminary hearing scheduled for 28/02/2025 at 9:00 am

02

Material facts

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution Counsel: Ms. Agness Awino, Mr. Alfred Tairo

Selina Kokutona @ Crospery

Accused Counsel: Mr. Gerase Reuben

Another (unnamed)

Accused Counsel: Mr. Gerase Reuben

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Session Case / Preliminary Hearing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The prosecution observed fatal defects in the committal proceedings, specifically non-compliance with Section 246(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act by failing to read and explain all witness statements and documentary exhibits to the accused, and a conflict of interest between the accused persons. They prayed for adjournment and recommittal.
Respondent
The defence raised no objection to the prosecution's prayer and requested that recommittal be ordered and executed within the shortest period.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20 R.E 2022

    Mandatory compliance with Section 246(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act in committal proceedings

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The committal proceedings were fatally defective due to non-compliance with Section 246(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act and conflict of interest between accused persons, necessitating recommittal and separate legal representation.

Court disposition

Committal proceedings nullified; recommittal ordered; adjournment granted

  • Adjournment of hearing granted
  • Committal proceedings by Bukoba District Court nullified and expunged
  • Bukoba District Court ordered to conduct recommittal in full compliance with Section 246(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act
  • Order to be complied with within 14 days
  • Accused to be represented by different advocates
  • Preliminary hearing scheduled for 28/02/2025 at 9:00 am

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 11 February 2025

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 11 February 2025

Selina Kokutona Ruling

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JUDICIARY

BUKOBA SUB REGISTRY

AT BUKOBA

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL SESSION CASE NO. 2280 OF 2025

THE REPUBLIC

VERSUS SELINA KOKUTONA @ CROSPERY & ANOTHER ……………… ACCUSED RULING OF THE COURT. Date of order and Ruling on 11.2.2025 BEFORE G.P.MALATA,J This case came for Preliminary hearing on 11/02/2025. Both parties appeared in Court. The Republic appeared represented by Ms. Agness Awino and Mr. Alfred Tairo learned State Attorneys where as the two accused persons appeared represented by Mr. Gerase Reuben learned counsel. Ms. Agnes Awino learned State Attorney stood and informed this Court that they have observed fatal defects in the committal proceedings. She stated that defect that, one, non compliance of Section 246 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20 R.E 2022 by failure to read over and explain all the witness statement and documentary exhibits to the accused, and two, the 2nd accused has conflict of interest with 1st accused as she named the 1st accused to have grudges with the father of the deceased. 1 Ms. Agness Awino learned State Attorney ended praying to the Court for adjournment with an order of recomittal by the committing Court. She also opined that, in that circumstance of conflict of interest accused person defended by different lawyers. Mr. Gerase Reuben learned counsel raised no objection to the prayer in respect of the observed defects. He finally prayed that, the recommittal be order and executed within the shortest period. Having received the concerns from both

counsels of the parties to this case, this Court, took time to read the committal proceeding in particular pages 7, 8 and 9 and noted that, the raised defects exist on the record. It is evident that, the defects are fatal and cannot be cured without an order of recommittal as suggested. In the event, this Court is inclined to agree to both counsels’ submissions. Consequently, this Court hereby orders that; 1. Prayer for adjournment of hearing of case is granted.

2. Committal proceedings by Bukoba District Court is hereby nulified for want of compliance with mandatory provision of Section 246 (2) of the CPA, hence it accordingly expunged from Court record.

3. Bukoba District Court is ordered to conduct recommittal in fully compliance with Section 246 (2) of the CPA by reading over and explaining to the 2 accused all statements of the witness and documentary exhibits by the Republic.

4. This Court’s order be fully complied with by Bukoba District Court within 14 days from the date of this order.

5. Accused shall be represented by different advocates.

6. Preliminary hearing to be held on 28/02/2025 at 9:00 am IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED at BUKOBA this 11th February, 2025. G.P. MALATA

JUDGE 11/02/2025 RULING delivered at BUKOBA this 11th February, 2025 G.P. MALATA

JUDGE 11/02/2025 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20 R.E 2022, Section 246(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.