computer logix limited another vs zamzam shadadi issa another 2022 tzca 485 1 august 2022
The application for revision was filed outside the prescribed 60-day limitation period under Rule 65(4), and the exclusion of time spent obtaining certified copies is not applicable to revision applications; therefore, the application is time barred.
- Citation
- computer logix limited another vs zamzam shadadi issa another 2022 tzca 485 1 august 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Computer Logix Limited; Applicant: Stephen Mapunda; Respondent: Zamzam Shadadi Issa; Respondent: Seif Issa Fikirini
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application struck out as time barred
- Legal Topics
- Revision, Limitation Period, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Computer Logix Limited
Applicant
Stephen Mapunda
Applicant
Zamzam Shadadi Issa
Respondent
Seif Issa Fikirini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for revision was filed within the prescribed limitation period under Rule 65(4) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
- 2 Whether time spent obtaining certified copies of proceedings is excludable for revision applications
Ratio Decidendi
The application for revision was filed outside the prescribed 60-day limitation period under Rule 65(4), and the exclusion of time spent obtaining certified copies is not applicable to revision applications; therefore, the application is time barred.
Court Disposition
application struck out as time barred
Orders
- application struck out with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment