comviva technologies ltd vs venance edson 2020 tzhcld 197 5 june 2020

comviva technologies ltd vs venance edson 2020 tzhcld 197 5 june 2020

The applicant provided credible medical evidence showing that non-appearance was due to illness and pregnancy, which constituted a satisfactory explanation under Rule 36(1), justifying re-enrollment of the case.

Citation
comviva technologies ltd vs venance edson 2020 tzhcld 197 5 june 2020
Parties
Applicant: COMVIVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD; Respondent: VENANCE EDSON
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Re Enroll Revision
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Dismissal, Re Enrollment of Case, Non Appearance, Sufficient Cause
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Setting Aside Dismissal Re Enrollment of Case Non Appearance Sufficient Cause

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

COMVIVA TECHNOLOGIES LTD

Applicant

VENANCE EDSON

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Re Enroll Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant provided satisfactory explanation for non-appearance on 1st March 2018 to justify re-enrollment of the case

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant provided credible medical evidence showing that non-appearance was due to illness and pregnancy, which constituted a satisfactory explanation under Rule 36(1), justifying re-enrollment of the case.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Revision Application No. 354 of 2016 is re-enrolled as prayed