19921217 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Appellant failed to show sufficient cause for his non-appearance; the dismissal under Order 17 Rule 2 and Order 9 Rule 8 was proper and restoration was not warranted.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19921217 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Conrad Kessy; Respondent: Yusufu Mwanga
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Non Appearance, Restoration of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conrad Kessy
Appellant
Yusufu Mwanga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant showed sufficient cause for non-appearance to warrant restoration of the dismissed suit
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant failed to show sufficient cause for his non-appearance; the dismissal under Order 17 Rule 2 and Order 9 Rule 8 was proper and restoration was not warranted.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- dismissal of appeal
- no restoration of suit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
/ . D-i 1:'IIE IT.[G::I COURT 0~ TANZANIA . .. \ -~ 'PPJ.. ~ §!I:WT . (F.roo tho d.ooision of tho 1)1.s-'~ot CoUJ."t of KiS't.'lii'~t nt ICimrbLt L1 CiVil Ca-. se No. 3 of 19$9) Dafo:t<o S.S .. SEME1 Rosidant McJ.Gist:t'atG Vm'E!l.lS YUSU:FU IWllrGA, ........ • • • • • ~-.., .. • • ... ~ • ... ., : • , • • • • .•Il.ESPOlillEt~ ..... J_U......_D_C,JI E N T MJ,I}TJ., JJ. . A suit f'ilod. ~- t)o e.ppollant, Coi:1:t'cd. K.cssy, r,cainst the rospondont Yu.s-J.fu M ~,'f<l, was dis.tlisscd by tho rcsid.ont Magistrate's court for: n011.-aP'.[)Or"C:J11oe of tho appellant., lu1 e,pplioation wa;s filod. for i"Gsilorct ..on of tho suit, but that applioe,'fiion was disz:ii- ssod.. T'D.O l),;_Jpcll. 11; now c1.,ppoals to this cot-1.rl,. ,J · Who11 t:10 ~cJ court fu:od tho hca'.L'illG Mta, t~10 appellant vme prcsant.. So .i!: vro.s ml"CCL"G t~u,,t t20 sui-t ·wouJ.d bo hon:ro. 0~1 1st At.i.cus-'v, l99c1., l :iJut when tho case was celled for !1oaring, tho c.ppelJ.wt ~1d h:, .J nd.vocato waro 0bso11t. Tho o.rdor for tho dis;iiss~ . # ·of tl10 B'~ti.t 1n:-,r rrulo under Ordor 17 Rulo 2 of t.".lo Civil Prooodu:ro · Coda. 111110 [tJp;.J.lDltt ru.logod in t:10 a.ffidnvit i'ilod. £~ nn order to sot r.sida t 1.0 distrl.ssc.l of t11c St.ti. t, tb.c.-'i. ho 1-T:1S in tho co'Ul:C ell tho ·lli;:10 ,«lCl ho lntOJ:'· won·~ to K:ivukoni ootlrt: lT'.'.lo:r.<G ho vro,s infornod tl12.;~ t:.io FJU.it hp,d "been dismescd for noa-.:\ppoa.rnnoo. Dut c.s Mr. Joil.ojc, locrnod oounsol for· the roopo~l.dant, suboi ttod 1n· · support of t:· l do-oision of tho district cou:rt 1 ii'lo oontonts of .tho o.ffid.c!nt -~.; ,iot true. Mr. Jndoja. and the l'O£JJ?ondan1i wor<l in tho cou:rt e:iJl.ao :..---6:·"..:d.ne, and tho order for dismssc.l of t!w suit was. oc:il.o in tho D.f",;.m.1oon. So, if tho appoll~t hnd. boan :i.n tho cou:d; in tho tlOl.....ui..1...:; ·i.,s ho n.lloeod, ho would hr..vn fotmd· out tb.o.t tho auit wns f:b:;od· fo~ :.o~ in t!lo o.fte.rnoon. It eeo::1s, thorefore, that tho n.ppolla:n·:; ·. ,,,s a.bscnt on tho fu,,·hG fir..,ad for tho !10ari.ng of tho suit, oitd ho 0.::.;:JO to }cn.c,,r ~--tha-a.isnie~. .of t1JP suit ...la.to.1!. ! • _ '- : - 2 - Tho suit 1rc.s diriosod. under Ord.or 17 Rule 2 ef tho Civ.U Pr-oc~ ~ :ooad. toeothor with O:r.'d.or- 9 Rulo 8 which. l!ooo.s D.S follows& tt'ifuaro tho def'ondnn:fr e,~Q,'L's nl1d tho pl,aintiff dooa not a,ppoar, wlum tho suit is. oollod. ~n for hoo.1-"ine tho court ahD.l1 ~ an Ord~ th.at tho a-..ti.t bo dis:rl.13SOO. unloss tho d.G:fonclwt t1dttt ts tllo ola.in. • • • •• • <#--. • ., " ~3.noa tho rosptl!ld.ont. did not ndoit tho olain :fuo o ~ :f'~r . • disttiseal of tho suit was nand.a'bs.t'Y • Tho 0,ppelui21t had to BMW suff'iciont ~auso for his non--:-appc~o bofo~o th,o t,p;td.ar fer disoiss!l ft tho suit oould bo sot asido, ~s providod in ~:r:d.or 9 RulG ·9( 1) tf · 'l,ho Civil ~oodl.Jlto coa.o. Tho ;,'<)spondont did .net show sut:t'ioiont .\ •&.\SO• He was absont. wh"n tho :.uit wns oallod on fol!. 1¥3~• AB I ea.id, tho rcspcnd.0111 was not tolllnG tho t:t,tth wh~1 ho so.id that he w~.s _present in t:10 ~·· . no~, h:r had. ho boon prose11t ho would ha.vie kn.es 'iha.t tho suit 1ro,a fi:rod 'for hot;~:1.nG. iJ.1 tho a.ftomoon... llo ,m,uld., · · t ~ h'!;V'O waited ~ t:10 rospcnd«i, and his ooUnsol did,, :i.llt0 t:Dial. o ~ •parl,y found tJ:w..t t:ioro was ri.o su.ffioiont cruse for t.b.o ·appollsnt 1 s n~poa.t'anco~ 1 11.J ,1-unr.A. .nnxm ,, ,f.' 4t ~ 08 Sal&"ln ,,. ~ , 1992 ~. N~sala. for tho Appel: ~ .t1 t . MY, ~<£.t:t:r! tho Rospon:. ~int-" I OG»ti-'f.y t!.u\t ~ :'. ~: a tru.o oopy of th .