Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

CONTRIVE ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD Kafanabo

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the deed of settlement filed by the parties met the legal requirements for a consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, and accordingly adopted and recorded the settlement as the judgment of the court, marking the suit as settled on agreed terms.

Court disposition

suit settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • The 1st Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff TZS 25,000,000.00 in five equal monthly installments as outstanding sum for completion of the Wanyere Water Supply Scheme.
  • The agreed sum shall be paid in five equal monthly installments starting from 30th April 2025 directly to the Plaintiff's specified bank account.
  • The Plaintiff shall have no further claims against the Defendants including general damages and costs.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs in relation to the present case.

02

Material facts

Parties

Contrive Engineering Company Limited

Plaintiff Counsel: Evance Njau

Musoma District Council

1st Defendant Counsel: Neema Mwaipyana, Anesius Stewart, Anabu Shariph

The Attorney General

2nd Defendant Counsel: Neema Mwaipyana, Anesius Stewart, Anabu Shariph

Amounts and remedies

  • Agreed Settlement Amount: TZS 25,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Land Case / Consent Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff claimed full payment of TZS 25,273,334.40, general damages of TZS 10,000,000, 15% interest on the outstanding amount, and costs, alleging breach of contract and delayed payment by the 1st defendant.
Respondent
The defendants disputed the plaintiff's claims and prayed for dismissal of the suit with costs.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E. 2019

    A suit may be settled wholly or in part by a lawful agreement or compromise, and such settlement may be recorded as a consent judgment by the court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the deed of settlement filed by the parties met the legal requirements for a consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, and accordingly adopted and recorded the settlement as the judgment of the court, marking the suit as settled on agreed terms.

Court disposition

suit settled by consent judgment

  • The 1st Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff TZS 25,000,000.00 in five equal monthly installments as outstanding sum for completion of the Wanyere Water Supply Scheme.
  • The agreed sum shall be paid in five equal monthly installments starting from 30th April 2025 directly to the Plaintiff's specified bank account.
  • The Plaintiff shall have no further claims against the Defendants including general damages and costs.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs in relation to the present case.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 30 April 2025

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 30 April 2025

CONTRIVE ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD Kafanabo

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MUSOMA SUB-REGISTRY

AT MUSOMA LAND CASE NO. 000013057 OF 2024 CONTRIVE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED................................ PLAINTIFF

VERSUS MUSOMA DISTRICT COUNCIL................................................ 1st DEFENDANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL...................................................... 2nd DEFENDANT

CONSENT JUDGEMENT 14/03/2025 & 17/03/2025 Kafanabo, J.: This is a consent judgment ascending from a deed of settlement duly signed and filed by the parties in this Court on 13th March 2025. The said deed of settlement arises from a suit instituted by the Plaintiff on 4th June 2024 against the Defendants claiming for the following orders: i. The Plaintiff be fully paid amount of TZS. 25,273,334.40 timely. ii. The general damages of TZS. 10,000,000/= being compensation for the suffering, loss and costs for the whole time the 1st Defendant have delayed to make payment and breached the contract. iii. Payment of 15% interest rate of actual amount the 1st Defendant was supposed to pay the Plaintiff from the date of the breach of contract and from the date of order of this Court. iv. Costs of the suit. i On 24th September 2024 the Defendants filed their written statement of defence disputing the Plaintiff's claim and prayed for the dismissal of the suit, in its entirety, with costs. It followed that on 19th November 2024 Ms. Neema Mwaipyana (learned Senior State Attorney), Mr. Anesius Stewart and Ms. Anabu Shariph (learned State Attorneys) entered an appearance for the Defendants before this Court, and Mr. Evance Njau, a learned Advocate, entered an appearance for the Plaintiff. The learned counsels for the parties, after being engaged in an off-record brief discussion by the Court,

requested for time within which to attempt a settlement out of Court. The Court, acting on the spirit of encouraging mediation in resolving disputes was pleased to grant the time as prayed by the parties. Then two more adjournments followed on 10/02/2025 and 03/03/2025, and on 14/03/2025 Ms. Neema Mwaipyana, Senior State Attorney and Ms. Anabu Shariph State Attorney went on record addressing this Court that the parties herein have mutually agreed to settle their dispute out of court, the submission which, Mr. Evance Njau, Advocate for the Plaintiff, concurred with. It was further submitted that the parties have filed their deed of settlement in the e-Case Management System. The learned counsels for the parties thus prayed that the Court be pleased to record that the suit has been settled based on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement duly signed by the parties. It was further prayed that the Court be pleased to enter consent judgment according to the terms of the deed of settlement pursuant to Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E. 2019. 2 In light of the submissions and prayers of the parties above, this Court reviewed the said deed of settlement filed by the parties herein, and upon satisfying itself that the deed of settlement meets the legal requirements of being recorded as a decision of this Court under Order XXIII of the

Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 R.E. 2019, this Court hereby adopts and records the deed of settlement filed by the parties herein on 13th March 2025, and it is, therefore, part of this consent judgment. Therefore, this suit is hereby marked settled amicably and voluntarily by the parties, and in particular, on the following orders: 1. The 1st Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff a total of Tanzania Shillings Twenty-Five Million (TZS 25,000,000.00) in five (05) equal monthly installments, totaling Tanzania Shillings Twenty-Five Million (TZS 25,000,000.00), being the outstanding sum after completion of the construction of the Wanyere Water Supply Scheme at Suguti and Kusenyi villages which was awarded to the Plaintiff through tender Number LGA/066/2016/2017/W/HQ/01 Lot 1.

2. The agreed outstanding sum which was claimed as specific damages shall be paid by the 1st Defendant in five equal monthly installments starting from 30th day of April 2025 and the same shall be paid direct to the Plaintiff's Bank Account No. 0150331868200 CRDB Bank.

3. The Plaintiff shall have no further claims against the Defendants including general damages and costs of the case.

4. Each party shall bear her own cost in relation to the present case (Civil Case No. 000013057 of 2024). 3 Therefore, as ordered herein above, the present suit is hereby marked settled as per the terms of the deed of settlement and executable as a decree of this court in light of the above orders. It is so ordered. The judgment was delivered in the presence of Mr. Evance Njau, Advocate for the Plaintiff and in the presence of Ms. Neema Mwaipyana, Senior State Attorney and Ms. Anabu Shariph, State Attorney for the Defendants. K. I. Kafanabo Judge 17/03/2025 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E. 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.