crdb bank vs joyce deodatus kato and 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 398 27 august 2021
The High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for stay of execution after the filing of an appeal. The application is not an abuse of court process, and the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for stay, including risk of irreparable loss if execution proceeds before the appeal is determined.
- Citation
- crdb bank vs joyce deodatus kato and 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 398 27 august 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: CRDB Bank; 1st Respondent: Joyce Deodatus Kato; 2nd Respondent: Deodatus Kato; 3rd Respondent: Eradius William
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Jurisdiction, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CRDB Bank
Applicant
Joyce Deodatus Kato
1st Respondent
Deodatus Kato
2nd Respondent
Eradius William
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of execution was properly before the High Court or should have been filed at the executing court
- 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of court process
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the application for stay of execution after the filing of an appeal. The application is not an abuse of court process, and the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for stay, including risk of irreparable loss if execution proceeds before the appeal is determined.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Execution of the decree in Misc. Land Application is stayed pending determination of Land Appeal No. 64 of 2020.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment