CRDB BANK PLC VS JOEL JACKSON PANJA OTHERS MISC

The application is allowed not because the applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds, but in the interest of justice, considering the substantial amount involved and the overriding objective principle; thus, the dismissal order is set aside and the suit restored.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: CRDB BANK PLC VS JOEL JACKSON PANJA OTHERS MISC
Parties: Applicant: CRDB Bank PLC; 1st Respondent: Joel Jackson Panja; 2nd Respondent: Award Jackson Panja; 3rd Respondent: Mrs. Christina Joel Panja; 4th Respondent: Alex Joel Panja (held by Joel Jackson Panja as Trustee); 5th Respondent: Esau Joel Panja (held by Joel Jackson Panja as Trustee); 6th Respondent: Hekima Enterprises Company Limited
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 1 January 2024
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Restore Suit
Outcome: Application allowed
Legal Topics: Restoration of Suit, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Service of Process, Overriding Objective Principle
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Restoration of Suit Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Service of Process Overriding Objective Principle

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

CRDB Bank PLC

Applicant

Joel Jackson Panja

1st Respondent

Award Jackson Panja

2nd Respondent

Mrs. Christina Joel Panja

3rd Respondent

Alex Joel Panja (held by Joel Jackson Panja as Trustee)

4th Respondent

Esau Joel Panja (held by Joel Jackson Panja as Trustee)

5th Respondent

Hekima Enterprises Company Limited

6th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Restore Suit

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause to set aside the dismissal order and restore Civil Case No. 983 of 2024

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

Dismissal order in Civil Case No. 983 of 2024 dated 3rd June 2024 is set aside.
Civil Case No. 983 of 2024 is restored.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.