CRDB KAMKALA
Absence of affidavit by plaintiff or agent under Order V Rule 27 means service was not duly proved; mere stamp is insufficient. Ex parte order set aside.
- Citation
- CRDB KAMKALA
- Parties
- Applicant: CRDB BANK PLC LTD; 1st Respondent: Gerald Kamkala (The Administrator of the Estate of the Late Jane Gervas Kamkala); 2nd Respondent: Cornelis Hendrick Van Vianen; 3rd Respondent: Octavian Joseph Kidima
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Order
- Outcome
- Application allowed; ex parte order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Summons, Ex Parte Proceedings, Setting Aside Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CRDB BANK PLC LTD
Applicant
Gerald Kamkala (The Administrator of the Estate of the Late Jane Gervas Kamkala)
1st Respondent
Cornelis Hendrick Van Vianen
2nd Respondent
Octavian Joseph Kidima
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was duly served with summons as required by law
- 2 Whether the ex parte order should be set aside due to non-service
Ratio Decidendi
Absence of affidavit by plaintiff or agent under Order V Rule 27 means service was not duly proved; mere stamp is insufficient. Ex parte order set aside.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; ex parte order set aside.
Orders
- First respondent to serve applicant with summons to file Written Statement of Defence on or before 6th December, 2024.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment