crispin prosper mwombeki vs republic 2022 tzhc 15513 27 december 2022
- Citation
- crispin prosper mwombeki vs republic 2022 tzhc 15513 27 december 2022
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 27 December 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 27 December 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The offences charged are bailable and not restricted by law; the applicant's request for bail is legitimate and grantable, subject to fulfillment of specific bail conditions due to the high value of the subject matter.
Court disposition
Bail granted subject to conditions
Orders
- Applicant to deposit cash sums or title deed(s) for landed properties, or properties approved or certified to have the value equivalent to one-fourth of the cumulative half of the value of the subject matter of the charge (TZS 672,989,819.18)
- Applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each executing a bond worth TZS 672,989,819.18
- Applicant to appear in the trial court each time Economic Case No. 14 of 2022 is called and throughout the trial proceedings
- Applicant to surrender passport or other travel documents to the trial court for the duration of the trial
- Trial magistrate to verify and scrutinize bond and other documents submitted by the applicant and sureties
02
Material facts
Parties
Crispin Prosper Mwombeki
Applicant Counsel: Nehemiah Geofrey NkokoThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Estazia WilsonAmounts and remedies
- Aggregate Value of Subject Matter of Charges: TZS 5,383,918,553.41
- Cumulative Half of the Value of the Subject Matter: TZS 2,691,959,276.7
- One Fourth of Cumulative Half (applicant's Bail Burden): TZS 672,989,819.18
- Surety Bond Amount (each): TZS 672,989,819.18
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail despite the value of the subject matter exceeding the trial court's pecuniary limits
- 02
Whether the offences charged are bailable under the law
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The offences charged are bailable and the applicant can meet the conditions set under section 36(5) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap. 200 R.E. 2022, and any other conditions imposed by the Court.
- Respondent
- The respondent does not oppose the application for bail.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap. 200 R.E. 2022
Offences are bailable unless restricted by law under section 36(4) of Cap. 200 or any other law.
- 02
Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap. 200 R.E. 2022
Where the value of the subject matter exceeds the pecuniary limits of the trial court, the matter must be brought to the High Court for determination of bail.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The offences charged are bailable and not restricted by law; the applicant's request for bail is legitimate and grantable, subject to fulfillment of specific bail conditions due to the high value of the subject matter.
Obiter and limits
- The humongous nature of the value of the subject matter means that the matter must be brought to the Court’s attention for determination.
Court disposition
Bail granted subject to conditions
- Applicant to deposit cash sums or title deed(s) for landed properties, or properties approved or certified to have the value equivalent to one-fourth of the cumulative half of the value of the subject matter of the charge (TZS 672,989,819.18)
- Applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each executing a bond worth TZS 672,989,819.18
- Applicant to appear in the trial court each time Economic Case No. 14 of 2022 is called and throughout the trial proceedings
- Applicant to surrender passport or other travel documents to the trial court for the duration of the trial
- Trial magistrate to verify and scrutinize bond and other documents submitted by the applicant and sureties
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 27 December 2022
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 27 December 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE SUB- REGISTRY OF DAR ES SALAAM
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 189 OF 2022 (Arising out of Economic Case No. 14 of 2021 from the Resident Magistrates’ Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu). CRISPIN PROSPER MWOMBEKI ………………………… APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC ………………………………………………. RESPONDENT
RULING 27th December, 2022 ISMAIL, J. The applicant is one of the four accused persons who are charged with assorted counts constituting economic offences. The case is pending in the Resident Magistrates’ Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu. The aggregate value of the subject matter of the charges is TZS. 5,383,918,553.41, as quoted in count 37 of the charge sheet. In the pendency of the trial proceedings, the applicant, the only of the quartet who is still incarcerated, has instituted the instant application for grant of bail. The affidavit that supports the application, sworn by Mr. Nehemiah Geofrey Nkoko, its deponent, states that, though the value of the 1 subject matter exceeds the pecuniary limits of the trial court, the offences charged are bailable. The deponent of the affidavit further contends that the applicant has what it takes to meet conditions set under section 36 (5) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap. 200 R.E. 2022, and any other conditions as may be imposed by the Court. The application has not been opposed to by the respondent. This position has been stated by Ms. Estazia Wilson, learned State Attorney. I have gone through the application. I am in agreement with both counsel that the offences charged are bailable. However, the humongous nature of the value of the subject matter means that the matter must be brought to the Court’s attention for
determination. This means that the prayer for grant of bail is justified. I take the view, as well, that such offences are not those that are restricted by law, under section 36 (4) of Cap. 200, or any other law. The totality of all this means that the applicant’s quest for bail is legitimate and grantable. Consequently, I admit him to bail. Admission of the applicant to bail is subject to the following clear and specific conditions: 1. The applicant shall deposit cash sums or title deed(s) for landed properties, or properties approved or certified to have the value that is equivalent one-fourth of the cumulative half of the value of the subject matter of the charge. This works out to TZS. 2 2,691,959,276.70, and the applicant’s burden works out to TZS. 672,989,819.18; 2. The applicant should produce two reliable sureties, and each of sureties shall execute a bond worth TZS. TZS. 672,989,819.18; 3. The applicant shall avail himself and appear in the trial court i.e. Resident Magistrates’ Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu, each time Economic Case No. 14 of 2022 is called on for orders and in the entirety of the pendency of the trial proceedings; 4. The applicant shall surrender his passport or other travel documents (if any) to the trial court, and that such document(s) shall remain in the court’s custody for the entirety of the trial proceedings; 5. The trial magistrate, or any other magistrate acting on his behalf, shall verify and scrutinize bond documents, and any other documents, as submitted by the applicant and his sureties. Order accordingly. 3 DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 27th day of December, 2022. M.K. ISMAIL
JUDGE 27.12.2022 4
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.