20100312 TZCA Tanga5
The application was filed fourteen days out of time, rendering it incompetent and liable to be struck out.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20100312 TZCA Tanga5
- Parties
- Applicant: Cyprian Maboleo Hiza; Respondent: Eva Kioso; Respondent: Mrs. Semwaiko
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Time Limitation, Court Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cyprian Maboleo Hiza
Applicant
Eva Kioso
Respondent
Mrs. Semwaiko
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit under the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed fourteen days out of time, rendering it incompetent and liable to be struck out.
Court Disposition
application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- application for leave to appeal struck out with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
iN.tHE COURT.Of'.·A •..PEAL OF TANZANIA. I ATTANGA CIVIL APPLICATlbN NO. 4 OF 2009 . . .. ··.•· "· .'.··• ',c.,:<,;ft,,,,,,c,o ' . . C •• •• . •. CYPRIAN MABOLEO HIZA ........................................... APPLICANT I : :. -·> -· .. .,... Versus . ·.... . .. 1. EVA.KIOSO ·. . · : >:· .. -: . - :.. ' .;. .. 2. MRS. SEMWAIKO }. ....................................... RESPONDENTS (Application for to leave to appell to the Court of Appeal from the Judgment of the :High'Coiirt'of ra·nzan·ia at Tailga) ,, '(Musla, J.) · · ! Dated the 20 day of October, 2005 ' l·-.•-r- J"I-•,-• :I In ·•·rtr · •. . ' Civil Appe~I :'10. ·&1 of 2005 '"--··· .. :..--Al.,,.l.ANGA- ---··t· .. · . i> ·c·-·~··•. ■ -i•······· ·1· -,.. . . .\....L '~ .i.i..·J-\r.t'~;L . · -ORDERi,V .. 4:ur. Lvi.J~ 12 March, 2010 MUNUO, J.A: ,.- .......... ,.·-:---"::rrt~~~--~,~n...:-:-?::'.~ .............,.:L'""'•·"-, . . . -•··- --·--;--··· ~-- i't .. -~~-.,.:"-_;----- -· The applicant Cypriarl' Mariibolecf Hiza was ·the unsuccessful party in . : I . . . 0 0 DC Ci~i1'·1tJ~~ar ~J. 1qaJ~;l'o"o{qR~il~~!~1~~e&i~~ft:Rzih~ I '1t?1~~a, ' > I before Mkwawa J. as he then Vi{~~~i;fB:~~~d appeal was determined on the 20th October, 2005: "Dis!.iif1Sfi~lP-~itl1~~@detisioidi'f Ittie High Court, the applicant lodged a nofiteilo'f Pa"~i!'ai{in6t:he'f1rol:lay of November, 200s, ~. .I within time. He then applied !~lt l:~ve to appeal to this Court in • . J •. ~ . . . . ! . . · · .. • . . . ,~_,. 1 j ' -t-- ~ ... I, . ·•. .... : ··, .. •:;· .; .. ·. . ' •, . • ,. l, • .,,/ ,.., ,, ·,_.·· , 1· ... '•I\• • I '.'\ •;, Miscellaneous Civil Application . No 61 . ·~. . . .. .. _,. of 2005 .. . . on. the . . . .. 2nd day of November, ·-,.';.· :.. ·, .. · ,. 2005, again within time. The application for leave to appeal to this Court was refused by Mussa, J. on the 24th July, 2009 · whereafter the applicant lodged the present application in this Court on the 21 st August, 2009. The application was correctly filed under Rule 44(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 which were repealed and replaced by the Tanzania .. ·- --- ·""";- - .. .. -----7• -~--,-.-,.- ~-· .--,- Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 which came into effect on the 1st day of 45. In Civil matters - .. ( a)' .... Whefe 'ahu'ap»earJie1°#/})1P!hrJ 1-1MivJ· 1Ht"th~' 'High -Court .. --- .. -0 :.1 application . lor.Y/eatJfJ;(ri,ay,\beJ . 'made2informallyAwhen., . ! the, --- :-; ,,_.._" ... - decision against which it is desired to appeal is given, or by chamber summons according to the practice of the .,, .. _,,u.J-·U)11C\,,L).Y.)11cU _UJl~U_ ,,,......... , ., 1 -·· , High Court, within fourteen days of the decision. , 1, _,_._j 1 '.), d iiiU I yvei~ r~peale~,; anu: ( ~f,)lu,.:u ... l.' )' ·. , . , '" .. , (b) Where' an appeal iies ' with the leave of the Court, application for leave shall be made in the manner ' .I prescribed in Rule 49_and·so.and within fourteen days of the decision qgainst which it is desired to appeal or, · ·· · ·_ · _ · · ,. _., .. ·_ --- 1· .. · · _..., -, ·_ • · I · ·· · .. · - · where the application for leave to appeal has been 2 · ,. -- ''·'" ,,,-?aninst-whir:h~itris-desircd-tn..:..ti()oea/- -" · · ,,.,. • 0 · • ·· •--')· .. 1,,,. ,i,;,u i :)wnmons.:a.ccorum~/- to hi(.-. J-; .. ., __ ;, .... . . i ! made in the High Court and refused within fourteen days of that refusal. In this application Mussa J. refused the application for leave to appeal to this Court on the 24/7/2009 so under the provision of Rule 45 (b) of the Court Rules, 2009, the applicant should have brought this application within 14 days commencing ·on·the··date··of- refusal· on the 24/7/2009. Instead the applicant brought this application on the 21 st day of August, 2009, twenty eight days after the refusal. Hence this application late by fourteen days; it should hav~ been filed by or before the 7th day of August, 2009. As the application is time barred by fourteen days, it is incompetent. I accordingly strike out the incompe~ent applicatiofl for leave to appeal with I . costs. ·· '•, · · · , ''1 I I . I·• th DATE at TANGA this 12 day of March, 2010 , ',: , I :i · E. N. :MUNUO JUSTICE OF APPEAL . 'I