CIVIL APPLICATION 146

CIVIL APPLICATION 146

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not demonstrate sufficient cause or apparent illegality on the face of the record; thus, extension of time is not warranted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
CIVIL APPLICATION 146
Parties
Applicant: D. B. Shaprya & Co. Ltd; Respondent: New Builders Ltd
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Sufficient Cause, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Sufficient Cause Illegality as Ground for Extension

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D. B. Shaprya & Co. Ltd

Applicant

New Builders Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for review
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the impugned decision constitutes sufficient cause

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not demonstrate sufficient cause or apparent illegality on the face of the record; thus, extension of time is not warranted.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs