damian kahamba and another vs ashura abdallah and another 2020 tzhc 3292 30 october 2020
The Tribunal's decision to declare ownership and nullify execution was a nullity due to lack of proper application, evidence, and violation of the right to be heard; proceedings were time barred and Tribunal was functus officio.
- Citation
- damian kahamba and another vs ashura abdallah and another 2020 tzhc 3292 30 october 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Damian Kahamba; Appellant: Abdallah Muzinga; Respondent: Ashura Abdallah; Respondent: Alistides Anta
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Objection Proceedings, Limitation of Actions, Ownership Determination, Execution of Settlement, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damian Kahamba
Appellant
Abdallah Muzinga
Appellant
Ashura Abdallah
Respondent
Alistides Anta
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Case Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred by determining objection proceedings that were time barred
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred by nullifying execution without a prayer for such relief
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred by declaring ownership without proper application and evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision to declare ownership and nullify execution was a nullity due to lack of proper application, evidence, and violation of the right to be heard; proceedings were time barred and Tribunal was functus officio.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision and orders from Application No. 312 of 2017 quashed and proceedings set aside
- Deed of Settlement of 31st October 2014 restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment