Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19921102 TZHC Mwanza 1

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The evidence established the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence imposed was within the statutory limits and took into account the seriousness of the offence.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence upheld
  • Appeals dismissed in entirety

02

Material facts

Parties

Damusi Kamanda

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Bentalwa

Hamisi Mwalimu

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Bentalwa

Lloyd Maru

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Bentalwa

The Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence Imprisonment Years: 7

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellants challenged both conviction and sentence, arguing the evidence was insufficient and the sentence excessive.
Respondent
Respondent maintained the conviction was proper and the sentence was within the law.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Penal Code, section 297 and 380

    Conviction for breaking into a building and committing a felony is proper if evidence establishes the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

  2. 02

    Minimum Sentences Act, 1972; Criminal Procedure Act, 1985

    Sentencing for scheduled offences must comply with the Minimum Sentences Act, 1972 and Criminal Procedure Act, 1985.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The evidence established the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence imposed was within the statutory limits and took into account the seriousness of the offence.

Obiter and limits

  • Had it not been for the vigilance of the watchman, a lot of property could have been lost.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed

  • Conviction and sentence upheld
  • Appeals dismissed in entirety

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 2 November 1992

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 2 November 1992

19921102 TZHC Mwanza 1

1--h b-t-1 TIT TJ:J TIIGH cot.m OF T::n3~1TL1 .:'.T I.fT..'lNZL ·no:: COTJJ.T CRIH]}L',I, }..?rJ~:.:J:., NO. G OF 1992 (CF) ID/cn/,".P.P.No.a 434 OF 1991 (Oric;in:.,l Cr:i.raincl Cas0 No.534 of 1991 o:f the District Court of Hv.s6mn. District n.t i'Iusor.m,. J.xfo1·0 r.I.J • · Lugo.zi31c1, :':sq. Rosid~mt ·Magistr do). 2.D1l)..'US IC.:'.:l1.::JD!l,::::l =mo • • • •-mo ~·.1,1...I.:."-)U.L 1•J.v1'[•:..t'·S-J..L l• • • • • • o • • • • o • o o • c o o o ~ • .., . ,. ,. . !-1\ml .1.~ J. ~.:i.J.J.l.J.-..1.'4.L (0-c':l.c,':i.n~~l Locuscd) S t 3. IL'l.oID ].;JlRU . versus TIT;::; fu.."'?UTILIC ( O:dGincl Prosecutor) JUJ)GM:::l;NT cont:c::ixy to coction 297 c..nd 380 of the ~cn--:.J. G0·lo. Tho paJticuJ.n.i•s of t~10 ch:::r[sc o.llccc:d t]:··-~ on or 2-lJot:ct: ~-- tho 22nd of' SoptJnbcr 1991 c..t 14.45 hrno at tho :::?.c,:::;ion;.,1 Stoxcc, I-io.,jitc. Rond wi. ti.lu.11 . 1'.1usoma 1 I 01m::i1.11p,· J.n T . . . . 'f ,., • ha..rn. _;_,.ogion t; ..1oy n:;;'t or.1pt od· J.l,o ,orccc l ~.-nc.1 on 01~, t the st'..id :!.legibm,l Sto::x> t)JpoUGh tho roof u:i:t;: intont to co1:1:1it ._, fc1on3, thoroj_n. 1..t [ho end of .,chc · t:ric.,l the n.ppcll<'.nt o uoro convicted 2.0 sent enc od to 'l'hcy ~ci 110,r 2.:1._)j_)Oa..lil'lG c.cainst both convict~.on ~..nd sentonco.~- Tho , l 2l1d ond 3r(l :-,ppoJ.lnnt s ucro ::_•;.::Je-~oc!1t od lJy r1r • Ilc.ntuJ.n.lci lc<'Z'nocl Couns·Ji" The J.r_;t

~~:P~Olln.nt ~-::.:.i/l_ i'iJ. ·'c! ~,::.:::: ovm ]_)Ctition _of' 2.:9]_)onl c.11.d J.J.o c1id not 1rit:.i to :.).U p:rcsont c.t t!10 hcc;cinc; of the awocJ.. The ._......... I I 1. L ... 2 Hr. BcntuJ.v..ld., a.t the stnrt of th: I2u,,:d11c of tho r..1J11c~J.,· withdrew. tho 1st groU11cl ho hc.d filed in r ::spoct of t.:1.0 2nc1_ c..nd 3rd C.J)poll.:-..nts on the cvidonc,i 1-u-opor a.nd lWll :fotmd0d. lce,ruly n.nd in tho cii:'otnotnncos of the cnso.,. ITc thus invited the coui..-t to int orf Cl.' trit h it• I have perused encl oon::ii(lCrod tho cv::i.dcmoo on rcoord ~ cJ.;I. tho .:i].')polln.ntot groundo of n:p1,cn.1 2.s ,•~oll L'C Con1s0ls'sullrnisoions,. nnd I am of. the settled 011inion thn.t tho conv:i.ct1.on of tJ11J tJ.rrco a,11p<ll.ants uc..s p:i:-op0r cmd. well founc.lc<l. T)1c cvicl.cncc• to;.1clc::_,cd did in ny view cstablii On scntonco,- fi':-Gt t~10 offence foJ.' 1~!.:icl: the o,p:pollr..).'ltG wcro convicto~ for icr c., oohodtt1cd offence in t(:,:-::is of pc:ir:.::,.·crih 12 of tho , lot sc:.1cdulo to tl10 lli.niour.1 SontonccG ~\ct, 197::1, ~ ......... 1n·oc..kincr into n 1JUilding cmd coru::iittin{s' :_:, ~"oJ.onf tho:;:-cin, contrc,ry to section 296 of ·tlw I>ona1 Code being c oc:.,odu.lod offonoc · in terms ./ of 11c.rnc,rn.ph 6 of thq scid 1st f.lchcdulo to tho ;.Iinir:nm Scn.tcnoos /:ct, 197. . Tho trial Ooui'.'t t ;_10roforo l.12..d pourn:> in t c:.:•r,10

of Sect ion 170 ( 1) (a..) of tho Criminal 1'1:'o0otll.r-:-c .:ict, 1985 to in1101Jo Be~1tonco not c:;:coodj_nc.- o:i.cf1t yonrs. The offonc? undOJ-:- aection 297 o.-.'..l':dcs a rn¢our.1 scntonco of 14 yor.rs imp.i.'isonr.1ent. In, j_n:rosing t210 sentence of 7 yon:rs inprisonmont · tl.10 trial cou:rt tool: into. nccount tho :JCj:fousncos of the offcnco fo:t' 1rhicl1 thcjr wore conv:i.ctoc'l. Ind.cocl it u~'.s :~.nd ;,.c,c1 it not been for t:'.l.o ........... .... • "-,,I .. - -· •• I vic;:U,:mcc of Jc::.<; uc.:bc::u:,,:.n, ::~ lot o:i:' provc::-ty could :::.,:wo boon lost •. an inclined to t210 viow, it is not so o:·o.-:rn:d.vo r:.s to wr'.rr::mt tho within the compotonco of t:~.c trial Court t,, :in::::ioso 0 The sc:ntcmco is acoord.itigly UJ.)hold and ,con:firra,1;; In th0 end. result these a:P1,eaJ.s fr.~il ancl they aro dismissed in their cntiTe~y• l!ppoaJ. dismissed• i ..J Delivered on this 2nd da3r of }frno1:111or 1992· in tho :r;xroscnco / At Mw-a.nza., 2nd November, 1992.•. ,,.._ ,,,,,_ -..._~ .·- ·,·,:, ~-' '! ,. ,._.,,,. '""' /-:r-, f ,,, ' t - : I• . • \. i'

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 297

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code section 380

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Minimum Sentences Act, 1972

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Procedure Act, 1985 section 170(1)(a)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.