daniel devadas vs fiderici striling spa 2005 tzhc 233 14 february 2005

daniel devadas vs fiderici striling spa 2005 tzhc 233 14 february 2005

The court marked the plaintiff’s claim as settled based on the written agreement in which the defendant accepted indebtedness and agreed to a payment schedule.

Citation
daniel devadas vs fiderici striling spa 2005 tzhc 233 14 february 2005
Parties
Plaintiff: Daniel Devadas; Defendant: Fiderici Striling S.P.A
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Settlement/order on Compromise
Outcome
Claim settled by agreement; decree issued as per settlement terms.
Legal Topics
Settlement, Debt Acknowledgment, Payment Terms
Source Language
English
Contract Law Debt Recovery Settlement Debt Acknowledgment Payment Terms

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Devadas

Plaintiff

Fiderici Striling S.P.A

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Settlement/order on Compromise

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff and the terms of settlement

Ratio Decidendi

The court marked the plaintiff’s claim as settled based on the written agreement in which the defendant accepted indebtedness and agreed to a payment schedule.

Court Disposition

Claim settled by agreement; decree issued as per settlement terms.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff US dollars 5,000 within seven days.
  • Defendant to pay balance of US dollars 27,711.73 in equal monthly instalments of US dollars 2,309.31 at the end of each month until full settlement.