daniel f machumbe vs joseph f machumbe 2005 tzhc 240 4 march 2005

daniel f machumbe vs joseph f machumbe 2005 tzhc 240 4 march 2005

The respondent should have filed a cross-appeal or revisional proceedings to challenge the District Court's decision; raising a point of law by notice is incompetent and misconceived.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
daniel f machumbe vs joseph f machumbe 2005 tzhc 240 4 march 2005
Parties
Appellant: Daniel F. Machumbe; Respondent: Joseph F. Machumbe
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 March 2005
Procedural Posture
PC Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
preliminary objection struck out, arguments dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Time Bar, Cross Appeal, Probate Proceedings
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Probate and Administration Preliminary Objection Time Bar Cross Appeal Probate Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel F. Machumbe

Appellant

Joseph F. Machumbe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

PC Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings in the Primary Court and District Court were time barred
  2. 2 Whether the respondent could raise a point of law without filing a cross-appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent should have filed a cross-appeal or revisional proceedings to challenge the District Court's decision; raising a point of law by notice is incompetent and misconceived.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection struck out, arguments dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The respondent's notice is struck out.
  • The respondent's arguments are dismissed with costs.