daniel mshahara shawa vs forecast microfinance and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 2318 16 october 2020
Illegality alleged in the DLHT decision, specifically denial of right to be heard, constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for revision.
- Citation
- daniel mshahara shawa vs forecast microfinance and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 2318 16 october 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Daniel Mshahara Shawa; 1st Respondent: Forecast Microfinance (T) Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Sanga Investment General; 3rd Respondent: Supply and Auction Mart
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application granted with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Mshahara Shawa
Applicant
Forecast Microfinance (T) Ltd
1st Respondent
Sanga Investment General
2nd Respondent
Supply and Auction Mart
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause exists for extension of time to apply for revision
- 2 Whether alleged illegality in the DLHT decision justifies extension
Ratio Decidendi
Illegality alleged in the DLHT decision, specifically denial of right to be heard, constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for revision.
Court Disposition
Application granted with costs.
Orders
- Time to apply for revision against DLHT decision extended for 30 days from date of ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment