daniel zengo vs shinyanga urban water supply and sanitation authority and another 2020 tzhc 2368 28 august 2020

The applicant failed to account for each day of the delay and the alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record or of sufficient importance to justify extension of time.

Citation: daniel zengo vs shinyanga urban water supply and sanitation authority and another 2020 tzhc 2368 28 august 2020
Parties: Applicant: Daniel Zengo; 1st Respondent: Shinyanga Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Authority; 2nd Respondent: Zakaria Mapya
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 28 August 2020
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Limitation of Actions, Malicious Prosecution
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Limitation of Actions Malicious Prosecution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Daniel Zengo

Applicant

Shinyanga Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Authority

1st Respondent

Zakaria Mapya

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient reasons for extension of time to appeal
2 Whether alleged illegality in the trial court's decision justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for each day of the delay and the alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record or of sufficient importance to justify extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs