dar es salaam city council vs hassan ngasongwa and others 2021 tzhcld 444 18 october 2021

Application dismissed because applicant failed to adduce sufficient reasons for the nine-month delay and alleged illegality was not substantiated, as leave for representative suit had been granted by the High Court.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: dar es salaam city council vs hassan ngasongwa and others 2021 tzhcld 444 18 october 2021
Parties: Applicant: Dar es Salaam City Council; Respondents: Hassan Ngasongwa and Others
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 18 October 2021
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Representative Suits, Delay in Filing, Revision of Arbitration Award
Source Language: english

Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Illegality as Ground for Extension Representative Suits Delay in Filing Revision of Arbitration Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2

Parties

Dar es Salaam City Council

Applicant

Hassan Ngasongwa and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether sufficient grounds exist for extension of time to file revision against CMA award
2 Whether alleged illegality in representative suit justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Application for extension of time is refused
No extension granted to file revision against CMA award

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.