daud godfrey macha vs mek one general traders 2020 tzhcld 52 22 may 2020
The affidavit in support of a Labour Court application must set out the reliefs sought as mandated by Rule 24(3)(d) of the Labour Court Rules, 2007. Therefore, including prayers in the affidavit does not render it defective in this context, and the Civil Procedure Code is inapplicable where the Labour Court Rules...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- daud godfrey macha vs mek one general traders 2020 tzhcld 52 22 may 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Daud Godfrey Macha; Respondent: Mek One General Traders
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Preliminary Objection dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Requirements, Application for Restoration, Preliminary Objection, Labour Court Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daud Godfrey Macha
Applicant
Mek One General Traders
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's affidavit is incurably defective for containing prayers contrary to the law
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit in support of a Labour Court application must set out the reliefs sought as mandated by Rule 24(3)(d) of the Labour Court Rules, 2007. Therefore, including prayers in the affidavit does not render it defective in this context, and the Civil Procedure Code is inapplicable where the Labour Court Rules provide specific procedures.
Court Disposition
Preliminary Objection dismissed
Orders
- Preliminary Objection dismissed
- Hearing of the application to proceed on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment