daudi mpangala vs edmund oddo others 2008 tzhc 68 27 march 2008
The appellant failed to prove that the respondents deliberately caused damage to his property; the evidence showed the damage was due to natural flow of water, not the respondents' actions. The appeal was filed within time, but lacked merit on substantive grounds.
- Citation
- daudi mpangala vs edmund oddo others 2008 tzhc 68 27 march 2008
- Parties
- Appellant: Daudi Mpangala; Respondent: Edmund Oddo Ndunguru; Respondent: Peter E. Ndunguru; Respondent: Pancras Andrew
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- General Damages, Specific Damages, Natural Flow of Water, Evidence Assessment, Appeal Out of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daudi Mpangala
Appellant
Edmund Oddo Ndunguru
Respondent
Peter E. Ndunguru
Respondent
Pancras Andrew
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred in framing issues applicable to specific damages instead of general damages
- 2 Whether the trial court erred in disbelieving the testimony of Pw4 due to his relationship to the appellant
- 3 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed time
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove that the respondents deliberately caused damage to his property; the evidence showed the damage was due to natural flow of water, not the respondents' actions. The appeal was filed within time, but lacked merit on substantive grounds.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- trial court's decision confirmed
- costs to follow the event
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment