david zhorzholadze vs matrida kimeme and 6 others 2020 tzhclandd 3969 3 december 2020

david zhorzholadze vs matrida kimeme and 6 others 2020 tzhclandd 3969 3 december 2020

The applicant failed to factually account for the entire period of delay and did not substantiate the alleged illegality; therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not established.

Citation
david zhorzholadze vs matrida kimeme and 6 others 2020 tzhclandd 3969 3 december 2020
Parties
Applicant: David Zhorzholadze; 1st Respondent: Matrida Kimeme; 2nd Respondent: Prisca Kimeme; 3rd Respondent: Doroth Kimeme; 4th Respondent: Geradine Kimeme; 5th Respondent: Robison Kimeme; 6th Respondent: Veronica Kimeme; 7th Respondent: GJ. Kimeme
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Bills of Costs, Reference Proceedings, Sufficient Cause, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Bills of Costs Reference Proceedings Sufficient Cause Illegality as Ground for Extension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Zhorzholadze

Applicant

Matrida Kimeme

1st Respondent

Prisca Kimeme

2nd Respondent

Doroth Kimeme

3rd Respondent

Geradine Kimeme

4th Respondent

Robison Kimeme

5th Respondent

Veronica Kimeme

6th Respondent

GJ. Kimeme

7th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the application for reference against the decision of the District Land and Housing Tribunal
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality justified extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to factually account for the entire period of delay and did not substantiate the alleged illegality; therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not established.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs