delta international investments sa v republic of south africa appeal no 001 2012 2013 afchpr 122 15 march 2013

delta international investments sa v republic of south africa appeal no 001 2012 2013 afchpr 122 15 march 2013

The Court lacks jurisdiction to receive the application as per Articles 5(3) and 34(6) of the Protocol, and its decision is final and not subject to appeal under Article 28(2). No new evidence was provided to warrant a review under Article 28(3).

Source-derived case information.

Citation
delta international investments sa v republic of south africa appeal no 001 2012 2013 afchpr 122 15 march 2013
Parties
Applicant: Delta International Investments SA; Applicant: Mr. AGL De Lange; Applicant: Mrs. M. De Lange; Respondent: Republic of South Africa
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Petition / Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling
Outcome
appeal not admissible; matter struck out
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Right to Dignity, Right to Property, Right to Information, Right to Privacy, Non Discrimination
Source Language
en
Human Rights Law International Law Jurisdiction Right to Dignity Right to Property Right to Information Right to Privacy Non Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Delta International Investments SA

Applicant

Mr. AGL De Lange

Applicant

Mrs. M. De Lange

Applicant

Republic of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Petition / Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has jurisdiction to hear the application against the Republic of South Africa
  2. 2 Whether an appeal lies against the Court's decision striking out the application for lack of jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether the applicants provided new evidence warranting review of the Court's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Court lacks jurisdiction to receive the application as per Articles 5(3) and 34(6) of the Protocol, and its decision is final and not subject to appeal under Article 28(2). No new evidence was provided to warrant a review under Article 28(3).

Court Disposition

appeal not admissible; matter struck out

Orders

  • The 'Appeal' submitted by Delta International Investments SA, Mr. AGL De Lange and Mrs. De Lange is not admissible.
  • The matter is struck out.