deo kazeni mbwambo vs godson kaizer mollel 2021 tzhc 2790 29 january 2021
The appellant was denied his right to be heard when the trial tribunal closed his defence case in his absence despite evidence of prior notice. This procedural irregularity was sufficient to dispose of the appeal without considering other grounds.
- Citation
- deo kazeni mbwambo vs godson kaizer mollel 2021 tzhc 2790 29 january 2021
- Parties
- Appellant: Deo Kazeni Mbwambo; Respondent: Godson Kaizer Mollel
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Heard, Procedural Fairness, Ownership of Property, Probate and Administration of Estates
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deo Kazeni Mbwambo
Appellant
Godson Kaizer Mollel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was denied the right to be heard by closure of his defence case in his absence
- 2 Whether the trial tribunal erred in its findings regarding ownership and sale of the suit property
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was denied his right to be heard when the trial tribunal closed his defence case in his absence despite evidence of prior notice. This procedural irregularity was sufficient to dispose of the appeal without considering other grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Orders of the trial tribunal closing the defence case and its judgment are set aside and quashed
- Record remitted to the trial tribunal for continuation of proceedings before a different chairman
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment