diamond trust bank tanzania limited vs riaz gangji 3 others 2022 tzhccomd 102 25 april 2022
- Citation
- diamond trust bank tanzania limited vs riaz gangji 3 others 2022 tzhccomd 102 25 april 2022
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 25 April 2022
- Posture
- Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 25 April 2022
- Posture
- Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found the deed of settlement to be a valid compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code and entered a consent judgment accordingly, restructuring the outstanding loan amounts and setting out terms for repayment and consequences of default.
Court disposition
consent judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff as per the deed of settlement
Orders
- Outstanding amount on first loan facility restructured to TZS 1,800,000,000 payable at 16.5% interest in monthly instalments of TZS 30,100,000 for 10 years from June 2022.
- Outstanding amount on second loan facility restructured to TZS 2,631,000,000 payable in bullet at 16.5% interest in 10 years from 25 June 2022.
- Accrued and unpaid interest since default in 2019 is waived.
- In case of default, plaintiff to issue 30 days' final notice before auctioning securities to recover outstanding amount including penalty interest and charges.
02
Material facts
Parties
Diamond Trust Bank Tanzania Limited
Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. KimaroRiaz Gangji t/a Abbas Emporium
1st Defendant Counsel: Ms. KaroliRiaz Gulamabbas Gangji (as administrator of the late Gulamabbas Rajabali Gangji)
2nd Defendant Counsel: Ms. KaroliRiaz Gulamabbas Gangji (as administrator of the late Mariam Gulamabbas Rajabali Gangji)
3rd Defendant Counsel: Ms. KaroliAsma Gulamabbas Gangji
4th Defendant Counsel: Ms. KaroliMohammed Ahmed Mohamed
5th Defendant Counsel: Ms. KaroliAmounts and remedies
- First Loan Restructured Principal: TZS 1,800,000,000
- First Loan Monthly Instalment: TZS 30,100,000
- First Loan Interest Rate: 16.5
- First Loan Term (years): 10
- Second Loan Restructured Principal: TZS 2,631,000,000
- Second Loan Interest Rate: 16.5
- Second Loan Term (years): 10
03
Procedural history
Posture
Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defendants are in breach of the credit facility agreement
- 02
Whether the parties' deed of settlement satisfies the requirements for a consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Plaintiff sought declaration of breach, payment of outstanding credit facility amounts, interest, damages, and costs.
- Respondent
- Defendants entered into a deed of settlement restructuring the outstanding amounts and terms of repayment.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code
A consent judgment may be entered where parties have reached a lawful compromise not induced by fraud or misrepresentation.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found the deed of settlement to be a valid compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code and entered a consent judgment accordingly, restructuring the outstanding loan amounts and setting out terms for repayment and consequences of default.
Court disposition
consent judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff as per the deed of settlement
- Outstanding amount on first loan facility restructured to TZS 1,800,000,000 payable at 16.5% interest in monthly instalments of TZS 30,100,000 for 10 years from June 2022.
- Outstanding amount on second loan facility restructured to TZS 2,631,000,000 payable in bullet at 16.5% interest in 10 years from 25 June 2022.
- Accrued and unpaid interest since default in 2019 is waived.
- In case of default, plaintiff to issue 30 days' final notice before auctioning securities to recover outstanding amount including penalty interest and charges.
Source and reliance status
TZHCCOMD · 25 April 2022
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHCCOMD
Judgment· 25 April 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 70 OF 2020
BETWEEN DIAMOND TRUST BANK TANZANIA LIMITED............ PLAINTIFF AND RIAZ GANGJI t/a ABBAS EMPORIUM................ 1st DEFENDANT RIAZ GULAMABBAS GANGJI (as administrator of the late GULAMABBAS RAJABALI GANGJI)............................................................... 2nd DEFENDANT
RIAZ GULAMABBAS GANGJI (as the administrator of the late MARIAM GULAMABBAS RAJABALI GANGJI...................................................................................... 3rdDEFENDANT ASMA GULAMABBAS GANGJI.................................................... 4thDEFENDANT MOHAMMED AHMED MOHAMED......................................... .....5thDEFENDANT Date of last order: 25th April, 2022 Date of Judgment: 25th April, 2022
CONSENT JUDGMENT MKEHA, J. In this case, the plaintiff filed a plaint for the following orders and reliefs: 1 | Page (i) Declaration that the 1st defendant is in breach of the Credit facility; (ii) Judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the 1st 2nd 3rd 4th and 5th defendants for payment of TZS 5, 549,655,300.52 (Tanzania Shillings Five Billion Five Hundred Forty -Nine Million Six Hundred Fifty- Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty- Two Cents) being outstanding amount in the credit facility respectively as of 31st May 2020; (iii) Interest at an agreed commercial rate on the outstanding amount stated above from the date of filing this suit to the date of judgment; (iv) Interest on the decretal sum at the court rate of 12% from the date of judgment to the date of full satisfaction; (v) General damages to be assessed by this Honourable court; (vi) The defendants jointly and severally be ordered to pay the costs of this suit and (vii) Any other relief as the court may deem convenient and equitable to grant. When the suit was ripe for hearing, but before the commencement of hearing the parties executed a deed of settlement to end their dispute. 2 | Page The said deed of settlement was filed before this court under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code. On this 25th day of April 2022, the parties through their legal representatives, Mr. Kimaro for the plaintiff and Ms.
Karoli for the defendants have appeared before this court asking it to record their deed of settlement as forming part of the judgment and decree of the court. Having been satisfied that the deed satisfies the requirements of the law under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, that is, having been satisfied that there is really an agreement of the parties for the compromise, which agreement is not a result of fraud or misrepresentation, deducing from the deed of settlement filed herein in court, the court hereby enters consent judgment and passes consent decree in favour of the plaintiff in the following terms: (i) By consent of the parties, the outstanding amount payable to the plaintiff by the defendants shall be the restructured amount of TZS. 1, 800,000,000 (Tanzanian shillings One Billion, Eight Hundred Million) in respect of the first term loan facility issued to the first defendant. The same shall be payable at an interest rate of sixteen -point five percent 3 | Page (16.5%) at monthly instalments of TZS 30, 100,000.00 for the term of ten (10) years effective from June 2022. (ii) By consent of the parties, the outstanding amount payable to the plaintiff by the defendants in the second loan facility issued to the 1st defendant shall be the restructured amount of TZS 2,631,000,000 (Tanzanian Shillings Two Billion Six Hundred and Thirty- One Million.) The same
shall be paid in bullet at an interest rate of Sixteen -point five percent (16.5%) in ten years from the 25th day of June 2022 without default. (iii) By the consent of the parties, the accrued and unpaid interest since when the facilities fell into default in the year 2019 are waived. (iv) Should the defendants default to pay any of the instalments as per paragraphs (i) and (ii) above, the plaintiff shall issue thirty (30) days' final notice after the expiry of which the plaintiff, shall proceed to auction the securities to recover the whole outstanding amount at the time of default including accrued penalty interest and charges thereon. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 25th day of April 2022. 4 | Page (I C.P MKEHA Sil f JUDGE 25/04/2022 Court: Delivered in the presence of Mr. Kimaro learned advocate for the plaintiff and Ms. Karoli learned advocate for the defendants this 25th day of April, 2022.
JUDGE 25/04/2022 5 | Page
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.