dickson mdoe vs said mtanda 2020 tzhc 4087 27 november 2020
Failure by the DLHT chairman to require assessors to give their opinions in court and make them open to parties is a fatal irregularity that renders the proceedings and judgment a nullity.
- Citation
- dickson mdoe vs said mtanda 2020 tzhc 4087 27 november 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Dickson Mdoe; Respondent: Said Mtanda
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Second Appeal, Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to the extent explained; DLHT proceedings and judgment declared a nullity and quashed; parties to bear own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Procedure, Assessors' Opinions, Nullity of Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dickson Mdoe
Appellant
Said Mtanda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Second Appeal, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the DLHT failed to include the opinion of the assessor, Ms. Sara
- 2 Whether the chairman of the DLHT assigned reasons for his departure from the opinion given by assessor, Mr. Kangele
- 3 Whether the DLHT offended mandatory provisions of regulation 19(2) of GN No. 174 of 2003
Ratio Decidendi
Failure by the DLHT chairman to require assessors to give their opinions in court and make them open to parties is a fatal irregularity that renders the proceedings and judgment a nullity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to the extent explained; DLHT proceedings and judgment declared a nullity and quashed; parties to bear own costs.
Orders
- DLHT proceedings from hearing to conclusion quashed
- DLHT judgment set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment