dira media group vs joseph kubebeka kulangwa and 2 others 2023 tzhc 1283 16 may 2023

dira media group vs joseph kubebeka kulangwa and 2 others 2023 tzhc 1283 16 may 2023

The applicant failed to provide a plausible reason for the inordinate delay of over 700 days and did not account for each day of delay. The alleged illegality was neither apparent on the face of the record nor properly pleaded. The applicant's negligence and lack of diligence preclude the exercise of the court's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
dira media group vs joseph kubebeka kulangwa and 2 others 2023 tzhc 1283 16 may 2023
Parties
Applicant: DIRA MEDIA GROUP; Respondent: Joseph Kubebeka Kulangwa; Respondent: Unnamed 2nd Respondent; Respondent: Unnamed 3rd Respondent
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time to File Revision / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitration Award, Unfair Termination, Limitation Period, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
english
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitration Award Unfair Termination Limitation Period Illegality as Ground for Extension

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DIRA MEDIA GROUP

Applicant

Joseph Kubebeka Kulangwa

Respondent

Unnamed 2nd Respondent

Respondent

Unnamed 3rd Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time to File Revision / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient reason to warrant extension of time to file revision against CMA award
  2. 2 Whether illegality is apparent on the face of record to justify extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide a plausible reason for the inordinate delay of over 700 days and did not account for each day of delay. The alleged illegality was neither apparent on the face of the record nor properly pleaded. The applicant's negligence and lack of diligence preclude the exercise of the court's discretion to extend time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs