director tilapia hotel limited vs ashura abdulkadri 2010 tzca 126 5 may 2010
Repeated procedural errors, whether deliberate or genuine, do not amount to sufficient reason for extension of time to file an appeal as required by the applicable rules.
- Citation
- director tilapia hotel limited vs ashura abdulkadri 2010 tzca 126 5 may 2010
- Parties
- Applicant: Director Tilapia Hotel Limited; Respondent: Ashura Abdulkadri
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Procedural Irregularities, Appeal Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Director Tilapia Hotel Limited
Applicant
Ashura Abdulkadri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether repeated procedural errors constitute sufficient reason for extension of time to file appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Repeated procedural errors, whether deliberate or genuine, do not amount to sufficient reason for extension of time to file an appeal as required by the applicable rules.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment