dismas so bunyerere vs republic 2018 tzca 462 27 april 2018

dismas so bunyerere vs republic 2018 tzca 462 27 april 2018

Applicant demonstrated good cause for delay by prosecuting an initial application struck out for procedural defect, and indicated the intended review is based on manifest error under Rule 66(1)(a), which imputes illegality and justifies extension of time.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
dismas so bunyerere vs republic 2018 tzca 462 27 april 2018
Parties
Applicant: Dismas Bunyerere; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
27 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review, Manifest Error, Illegality
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review Manifest Error Illegality

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dismas Bunyerere

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause exists for extension of time to file review
  2. 2 Whether the intended review application is predicated on a valid ground under Rule 66(1)

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant demonstrated good cause for delay by prosecuting an initial application struck out for procedural defect, and indicated the intended review is based on manifest error under Rule 66(1)(a), which imputes illegality and justifies extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted extension of time to file application for review within 30 days from date of ruling