dit saccos limited vs daud godluck sollo 2022 tzhcld 87 18 february 2022

Application struck out for being incompetent due to defective affidavit and failure to comply with mandatory provisions of Rule 24 (3) (a) and (d) of GN 106 of 2007, as conceded by applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: dit saccos limited vs daud godluck sollo 2022 tzhcld 87 18 february 2022
Parties: Applicant: DIT SACCOS LIMITED; Respondent: DAUD GODLUCK SOLLO
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 18 February 2022
Procedural Posture: Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome: application struck out
Legal Topics: Preliminary Objections, Affidavit Defects, Party Identification, Leave to Refile
Source Language: english

Labour Law Preliminary Objections Affidavit Defects Party Identification Leave to Refile

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

DIT SACCOS LIMITED

Applicant

DAUD GODLUCK SOLLO

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application for revision is incompetent for failure to meet statutory requirements
2 Whether the supporting affidavit is defective for non-compliance with mandatory rules
3 Whether the application failed to comply with CMA F.10 requirements

Ratio Decidendi

Application struck out for being incompetent due to defective affidavit and failure to comply with mandatory provisions of Rule 24 (3) (a) and (d) of GN 106 of 2007, as conceded by applicant.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

application struck out for incompetence
leave granted to applicant to refile proper application within 14 days from date of ruling

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.