19700729 TZHC Mwanza3
The evidence from the respondent, corroborated by witnesses and the Field Officer, established that the appellant's cattle caused the damage. The assessment of compensation was reasonable and based on the evidence. There was no merit in the appellant's grounds of appeal.
- Citation
- 19700729 TZHC Mwanza3
- Parties
- Appellant: Dmodi Bela; Respondent: Ziri Mohid
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Damage by Animals, Assessment of Damages, Appeals Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dmodi Bela
Appellant
Ziri Mohid
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's cattle caused damage to the respondent's cotton crop
- 2 Whether the compensation awarded was justified
- 3 Whether the lower courts properly evaluated the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence from the respondent, corroborated by witnesses and the Field Officer, established that the appellant's cattle caused the damage. The assessment of compensation was reasonable and based on the evidence. There was no merit in the appellant's grounds of appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The respondent is awarded costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment