19881213 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The period from the date of application for leave to withdraw the previous suit until leave was granted is excluded from the computation of limitation. The fresh suit filed in July 1987 was within the extended limitation period when this exclusion is applied.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19881213 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Domestic Appliances & Agencies Co. Ltd.; Defendant: Arbicult Cycles Industries Ltd.
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Point
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Extension of Limitation, Withdrawal and Refiling of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Domestic Appliances & Agencies Co. Ltd.
Plaintiff
Arbicult Cycles Industries Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Point
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is time-barred under the Law of Limitation Act
- 2 Whether the extension order by the Minister for Justice applies to a suit based on a cheque
- 3 Whether the period during which leave to withdraw the previous suit was pending should be excluded from limitation computation
Ratio Decidendi
The period from the date of application for leave to withdraw the previous suit until leave was granted is excluded from the computation of limitation. The fresh suit filed in July 1987 was within the extended limitation period when this exclusion is applied.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- preliminary point dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN 1lI1E IlI(f[I CmJRT : OF 1Ni.NZ.ANIA . .ATi ':atill f. J.!B S.ALA.llM CIVIL Gl\SE .·NO. 132 OF 1987 -. :DOMESTIC APPIJ:.AlfCES· & filciCIES . ,._ • . ' r ... , co. Il[j)• ••..• · • v~rtruB .AR8IC.lU'T KCYCLES IlT.ISUBTRITI)S 9 , • , • • • • .• • • • o ~ ~ • .. ~ llEfflr.MlifT :a U-k IN ,a Mr. Rni~hnthn., loai.---ncd. tH~~ol f'er tho def'ond.:.-mt lUJ.S 'raised o. :p:roiinil.'1."...L""'Y :poirr!i. in co1m0otion with those pr~coo~~':'.1.. It:>i• that the suit filed by tho plc.intiff ns civil oaAC no. 13? · ef 1987 is -t:i.I:te-11~d • . He oubaittcd. . f'urtho:r that tlio ::rui1t is oascd on t110 C1."1.equoa' which wore ~ d.ro:w11 in July 1907 ond dish•ncrured' in A1lt:,"'U.St 1977, The •sui:t·· ,llhwJ.d hMvo 1 boon f'ilod within 6. yoa.:vo t'l~or.i tp.o tio.e tht"I _•q.u.eo .. ~f ooti•n' a.rttsl) nonoly . ~ . - · A1lt,r:i.ist 1977.' But tho suit 1ras f'il_or. in 1987 inst:•ad ,ef ··1~83. Ilo· arguod f'urthor tlmt tho Miniate:r f oJ:' Justice und.er sectien 44 •f thd°' Law ~f Linitation Act is cwp~wer.Jd'te ostond tho pori•d ~:f' linitatiol'i \yup te one lml.f of th-:> :period :p:..--ooori'bod.• Tb.ore wa.s tho M:l.tlb°tor 1 , erdor whillh orlondod t!1o tioo for a fu:rtbor 3 ·yea.rs. "' Bu~ tho b:f;'oneien •rd~ was fe~ suit based on contract and w,t for a suit based ·,en a oheq_ue·; lI• · a.rgµod the.t oven if this ordor o:f t'.2.o,..Ministoi' w9rc te ,apply, tho suit 1roulc. atill be tine bm-rod1 booouso . the suit ougb.t to_, have bo~11 filed in July 190,.' . Mr.. R.:d tho.th.a rof~rrod tho oeurt ·fro socti•n 3 of tho Law ef L:i.I:tita.tion Aot 1J.nd 1:i:cayod tlmt tho suit should be disnissod. ' 'I I • IJ.1 roply, Miss Manda'.i:i, loa.rnod c-unsol fer the plaintiff acid,.th.at : ,· . t ,> • ' it lmS t~o that tho oti,.,.so·· of• action nreso in July 1977 • But, lho .so.id, . {" . tho ohoquos g;;,t nisplaood. T'.ion tho plnintiff seuaJit n.n extonsien nnd. tho Minister extcniod th• tine ef linitn.tien te J ~ 1906. Then th• ~ , . ' plcintiff scucllt loo:vq: ef ow.i-t i• W'ithdr.:i.w th• •:i-iur.-ino.l ~ . . suit· a.nd filo o. . frosh .-uit • But loave wn•~•t, f •rthc_or:line; until 1907; Aftbr 'iril.oh• leave rros (;t'O.ntod a frosh 'truit . ""WtU;J filed. "It ·wn.s tho plaintiff' e su.bnie.sien tb..st tho hash mrlt wo.s filod in tine. · " In a, shvrt reply, Mr. Rc.i tb.D.tha s(';j.d tb.e,t t1:o •rior·. f•r •:deiisi•n ,, o_f tine rolo.tos t~ a. suit f•r •roe.oh -.1t contra.ct. Mr. Ra.itha.tha. ••:rrtcnd~d ,. . . . tlmt tho :pla.intiff ceuld lmv.., ui thd.rawn tho suit en c•ntra.ct cn.rlior r.nd toot ft'wo.s not tho ceurti ~ fault that tho ouj.t wo n,t withdr-D,wn •~lier.• • • ... • •/ 2. ..... 2 Ho rofer:rod tho c6urt tl soctiM:ri 10 tlu:-ouch 0 •.26 ef th• Law of Linita.ti•n • Act r..nd isa.i cl tlmt tho plaint i:rfi o cn.oo wa□ not ·within ·tho o:x;copt'i •:nn in tho :rofo:t':..'Od ooctioi,10. I ~'TOO with Mr,. Rcit:1ktha thct th-l. pori'd ef lioitcti•n fer th• • proqont cn.u.oo 6:f action i;.1 t~a: c..--100 io 5 years:- Iton 7 eif Pm-t 1 •f the Fir·□i; Schcaulo t,f. tho .Lo.lr if Lir.1itction .Act J.ITe. . 1tf:.ef . 1971 cl•m-ly .. j pr,vidor.-.: o~. Tho questiln hero now io whether tho prosont au.it io tine 1,~ccl, .AD to tho 2nd point 6f Ilh'. Ra~tlmtha thnt tho •~onoien/erdoJ:' given by tho Minicto1• f.j:i:' i'.J\.wtico ,r.:-..o ior a GUit f•r. a...~iGos founded en con-h-o.ct .:i,_nd. not n IJUOOC.J:"Y oui t, I run. unnble to C{;l:'OO with ow.ch llJ:.'Gt,ll!lOnt • Thia io boc~uno the plaintiff lmd o.lroo.dy filed a auit fer dnracceo, in 157G a.nd 'in tine. Thero would be ru., roaoon ·for tho Miniotcn.• to o:ryond tho tine ref li.mitction for c -ouit :filed in tine. Tl:o ·ordci• tl:0rcforo wn.o in roopcct of tho ouit ba.ccd •11 tho cho\uqo. I ceoo now to tho n....,_,in im::.uo, nnd that ,ic wh~thor the civil c...".Oo Ne. 132 ef 1987 wao filed in title •:r net. Since t::o' linitc..ti•n· ,.po:i:'iod ·wna e:rl'.onlod from 6 yca.ro to 9. yo~o, the ouit ollould have boon filed by A~uot 1906. It wnc not f~iod until 9th Jtily 1$87. Tho plaintiff r.;;:-c,uod tbn.t thio io boco.uoo t~1.o c#il:i:'t dolcycd i11 c,;j_p.IJG ito loa,vo fer.,.tho pNV:i.wo, . l;'Uitt e '!Jo 1rl.thdrmm cm tlmt tho proviouo ouit woo net 1-tlthdro..wn _:until 7th.· Mo.y 1907 whon the court (,1'C11tod cruch len.vo. T'.uo plm.ntii'f contor..dod tbn.t. ,. it 1m.o not tho fc:ul t of t1~o •plaintiff th•."..t tho prociont IJUit '10.? not filed in tir.io. On tho other h..:1.nd, Mr. Rc!.itbntho. contond.od tMt it wo.a ~mtil~·ly tho fc,ul t of tho plcintiff t:W,t tho provieuo ouit ·wt•..o n•t . :?- thdro.1m o~lio~ _ anc. th...-?.t thio 00.00 did not .fo.11 within tho o:x;cepti•no•·· previdod in aioc.ti•·n ·,-: . .. - 19 tl:rouc;b. 26 •f tho Lo.11 of Lhti.tp,tion Ji.et conco:i.--iunc o:x:cluoi•n _of coi-.tn.in ~-. P~~iedo in cooputins tho po:--i•d ef li¢tction. I d• not oeroo thct tho. · -<.:- ....... Pl,:i.,i11tif:f could ho.vo Yithdrmm the oui t OD.t' lior boco.uo• .ho enly cov-01t to . :~i17~~w it when ho f--und tho clloquoo ~nd it wno only c.f;or tho o<IUrl ood ----ai-ciito~·-1~ tc. ·u:i.thdrc..1-r thc.t ho uithdrow "t;J.10 · ocno •. If he lmd -wi:tll~ ':~2~: tho provi~·:·ou1t-ti¼~~~t l~cvo of the court;··; -ho ctul.~ ntt fil~, a; l _; ---·f:rooh riv.it (vido 0.23 rulo 1-('3}....i'__ ,t?,O c.P.c.). T'i.J.0 i:,J.nintiff Md !• --· · . o.ppli.Jd f•~ loa:ro t• 1dthdrm·r tho· pr~~---~~---_ih Ap.~l .19~• ~ • _ .'·npplicctic-n wco not doto2tlinod until Ma.y 1987 • -~----~...,..,-...,,.,: ._,...... - -· Tho quootion to bo c,0kod· i□ now ulmt io to bo d~no?-.Lot..,_""A~ I . . . . ---- o.ooiotc..r;ico. Mr. R..':.t1tlmtli.c, hc,o nlrocdy f?CLid thct thio oituo.titn d900 i'M~~---~------ fcll within OJ'lY of tho oxcc:pti•no 9•vorcd by ooctitno 19 to 26 tf tho 1a.,/ . lf Linita.tiJ¼1 Act. Thct ~p::_:,oc.;o t• b~,.. cerroct. ~t th.ct io n.t tho whelo .t~tt!l boccuoo the:i:'o .:i:.:-o •thor oectie~ '!)c:idaa cootiono 19 t~ ~6 . lfhich ·dcc1 'With cerrputcti•n of tine. _~ ~ ho.vo 'in: Dind ooctiori 15 which roo.d.Qs ••••o•t/3.: 3 'If on t~lO CU:',tO 021 W1::.iol: 0. riG]_:t of C.ction fo::c G 1 I GU.it or an apJlioo..tion for tho e:x:om,tion oft decree nccrueo, tl:.o po:;_•oon to whon it 0..001"\J..OO io '\..mdor a dioa,bili ty, t::.o o,ction uo.,y be brou.j.:i.t at any. time 1.)efo:;:-e tho OJ:J.)i ~'Y of tho po'.i'.'iod of linito.tio1i proocribcd for ouch notion coqputod :f:i:>on tho 'd..."..to wLon tl.:.0 pe:;:-00:1 coo..ooc; to be undo:r a dioo,bility or die o, uhicJ.:.ovo1· ownt ocmT □ firot. 11 :tn ri;y- c0noidorod epin.ion tho e,1)0VO citod p:;.•ovioiono o.ro rolCVl:l.l'Tii in .. tllis e.:"-lJo. Tt.e cor.11J1..1.to..tion of tl:o period of lir.1itc,fiop ~1 our oooc -ohouJ.d. l)e :D.:-om 7/ 5/G7 when tl:o plc:ci.ntiff l7D..O wc,ntocl lecvo to withdrmr_ tho -:;: prcviouo r.,'ltlt with lilJorty to file 2,, frcoh 01.tlt. But f?oti 30/4/fJ6 to ~7/ 5/87 t>.ic porioc'c io c:x:cludoc1 i':i:'on tho cor.1pute:.tion of tho pori~d o:f lil'1ito..tion. Accordil'lG to tl:.o Minioto1'' c order oxtondinc tho linitc..tion po1•iod tl:o ou:i. t ahouldl ~-- boon filed by July 1906. It wno inrrtoc..cl filed in July 19G7. Thie "i'T0t.1J.cl o.,ppco..r to be in tiwo 1-i.1on tho ·po:riod .:f:i:>oo 30/4/86 ( when tl~o·{J?l)licr,tion foJ.' loc.vo to 1-d t:!.cl:i.'mr 1,no fiJ.od) up t~ 7/5/87 ( 1-t10n loc,vo to 1ri1;T:c1:_,".',W 1ro,::: C,To..ntod) io oy..0J.1.1dod. In other wo::;:-.dn, if tho o..:pplico.,tion for locvo to··1nthdrc.w· filed on 30/4/06 ho.d boon b.oaJ:"d [',nd c;.r-c,ntod on or ooout 30/4/0~ tl:on tho _pldntiff cmud hhvo filed• hie freoh :mit on or a.l)out 30/4/86 o · Thin irould hc..vo l;eon ucll within tioo. But t~1.o frooll. oui t 1ro..o not filed until July 1987 two nontho n.fto~ loo.VO to rtltl:~n.w lmc1 boon grr,rrtod, 'E.lc.t wao otill in tii:io 1Jocc..uoc it io cool)OZ'nblo to filinc tho fro::;h mi.it two noaths 8.fto1.~ 30/4/06 i.o. Juno 1986. .And thc,t would lmvo boon within tho lil.1itl~tion period. Foi' o.11 tho above roc..001w I find tho :p1'clirrl.11.c-u.'y :point to be laoki11B in no:d t a.nd I diooios it wi'lih cooto • JU:OOE Rul.i11G deliVC:i.'od. Ordoai Mention 7/1/1909, A. BAIIATI . .,i JUro]L_ 13/12/~900 \ ,'_ I ' Corti:f.>i..)d tru:o copy •f tJ.:o 02iginc.J. •