Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

19931230 TZCA Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The evidence adduced against the appellant was insufficient to justify a finding of guilt for the offence charged. The trial magistrate erred in treating a plea as a plea of guilty without ensuring the accused's understanding and without sufficient supporting evidence.

Court disposition

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence quashed.

Orders

  • Unless otherwise lawfully held, the appellant is to be set at liberty forthwith.
  • The conviction and sentence of Ally s/o Dilunga for the robbery at Kinyorozi are also quashed and set aside.

02

Material facts

Parties

Dominic s/o Matulo

Appellant

Republic

Respondent Counsel: Nios Kahuto

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Stolen Property: TZS 25,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that the evidence adduced against him did not justify a finding of guilt and that he was convicted of a crime he did not commit.
Respondent
The respondent relied on the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial magistrate, asserting the appellant's guilt.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General criminal procedure principles

    A conviction should not be entered unless the accused's plea is unequivocal and supported by sufficient evidence.

  2. 02

    General criminal procedure principles

    A magistrate must satisfy himself that the accused understands the facts and the nature of the plea before entering a conviction on a plea of guilty.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The evidence adduced against the appellant was insufficient to justify a finding of guilt for the offence charged. The trial magistrate erred in treating a plea as a plea of guilty without ensuring the accused's understanding and without sufficient supporting evidence.

Obiter and limits

  • A magistrate should always ensure that a plea of guilty is unequivocal and that the accused understands the facts and consequences.
  • Convicting a person of a crime he did not commit is a grave injustice.

Court disposition

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence quashed.

  • Unless otherwise lawfully held, the appellant is to be set at liberty forthwith.
  • The conviction and sentence of Ally s/o Dilunga for the robbery at Kinyorozi are also quashed and set aside.

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 30 December 1993

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 30 December 1993

19931230 TZCA Dar es Salaam

Al-:,PELLI\.TI:: J"C!:ISDIC1rICN IIIGTI c:J::·:rr C~UIITN!.L APP:8,_'_L m:·. 134 01'!1 1992 OF T:IE DIS'.I':JICT CU T:fl1 0./ ILALf. DISTRICT AT KIVUIWNI JJE:£<10ILl: J om., KIYETI ..J E3Qo, RillSI:.mJT I:11\.GIST:t.TE D0r1IlIT C Il:'l.~lE • • • •• • • • •••• , • • • 1'~PPELL.ii1'I1 (OillGIN~L ACC0SED) (Oil.ICINAL PROSECL1TOR) iL.1JDGMENT J3JJ,Ii~l·'11A, J .K. The appelln.nt, Do::u.nic s/o l'...at.1.lo, w::i.s charged before tho Distnot "11111 Court of Ilala., tosothor with two. ot~:cJ.."S' with robbory ri th viwlenoe, contrary to s. 285 and 2C'6 of tho Pcnc.J. Code. - It w~ nllesed in. the p:ll"ticUlQrS of offence thnt n Doninic s/o IIaule, Ally s/o D:i.11.lrlB'n and Saidi s / 0 Saluo. 0. ~ ••• 0 •• ~ •• Oi.1 '-~ho 13th day of Mareh, 19c9, at n'buut 19.00 l:m. at I(inpares:l Village within the llistrict ,)'!-: Ilnla' n.nc:. Dnr os S:i.laan Recion, jointly ' and together did s·toc.1 Cnsh.-"~,-odo/-, Olie ohotgun No 0 6,50 JM nnc'!. O!\C 1Jox wlucl: contained "enrious cloth.ea fror.: one SALEIT Ii>J!}i-T!.NA, nnd o.t, inr:iediatc ly be:fore o:t' :Lr:uediatcis' 3.ftor-t.1:o ·ci:,e of such stea.ling did use actual violemo by thro'.1tening to kill the s~id. SALE~'I: M!JT;f.NL witl! ~ i,iotol in ordo:r,- tti :rotnin t* obtain the said stc3loh property, valuad at •.bs• 25,000/a fror:1 SALEIIE I-.f.mtJTA"• .ALLY s/o Dilunrro. ~ oonviotod upon hi.s o,m. pl,oa 'wm:eh the

leo.:med. r.1,;;1v'1".istl'ate · took to bo n pl~tt pf {-;,,tiJ.ty -'&o .,~he ol'i:111ga. !he a.P,pel].a.nt, and Snicli Snlw.1 pleaded not {3'Ui.ity, but n;b ·hhe end· of the trit)J. -the a.ppellant was found C'Uilty o.a oho.rcecl G.ll.(L WD,S aentemed tQ n tero at thirty years' inprisonncnt~ .... Sllidi So.lw:i vk1S ::,Orjui t-tJclo Tho 0,ppollUTli now snyo ·bh::1t tho ovidonco ldd . in. :~ho . sco.1o :::.:.:;'.·i.nst hir.1 d:.d { no·~ r,uthoriso thu lonrnod trial · n.."1Gitl(1;i ';0 finc.l hin c;uiltyo :it wo..'J not disput )d a.t t~:ii, ti"ir.l t'..10.t on or c.bout tho 13th March, ·1993, two d:i.st;:'..lO'~ ::·ohbcricG w 1:'O po::,o·~ra.·bocl in Ilo.ln, dio·~rtot, one at f,.i11yorezi nncl ·'.;Lu otl1or nt Bt'. LU'l:.J.U. With rog.,rd to tho foraor robbc17, ~h~~t iG 1 tho llir:.y0rczi robbor; .. J it wns t\o prooocution t13 Oc.'3c _'.;hat; Salcho llbwni.10. wno :ro1 ::; ·,,1. of tl:o a.rtirJlco nc:T'.iioncd in the po.rticu.lC\roL<:>ffcnoc · L of horcinboforc cf.:.CJtodo To iophco.fo -~ho 2,ppolic.nt in tha-i; crioo J tho prosecution n/ '.uood evidence f"ron a~lly -a/o Dilungn, tho o..ppcllnnt 'a oo-c.ocuscd w1.u.o, ns will be r ,-.:c.llcd, 1-m.s corrvictocl upon his own plea of 11guilty 11 o Wit'1 c;rcnt rcspo::i·c to bot~: t:.:o lo::rnod trfol mgistr::1to ond the ►- prosecutor, A~.ly o/o Dilungo. c.1id no-:; co11foso to po.rticip~·a11g in tho ro1Jbory porpotrctocl a.JG

Kinyorozi, hio confosoion wo.s ·i;hct ::.o wo.s o. p2.r-Gy ·1;o o. rc~Jbory oon".1Htod .::i.t ::Jq:;·.:1';.:.ni. ':::'ho two robbcrioO wcro, nJ3 nlronc'.y_,Jndic.:::.tod, d.ist_:i.J'K}t Mc\ sopz::-2:~o. It is n ottor oi' sienificanco u ...;(~ . ·th-:rt.iin • otatoucnt of inc.ts given bj: -~~:i.o pr<?so01.~tor,. fol:_lowi.J.lg o. plea of tJg'l.lil ~y" being ?_nto:rocl by -~ho loL-,,rnoc"L :.1::JiSJG:r,~_to, ·tho;c woa ~q, ;allegation, o,i.l'Cot or otho~oo, -~~i..:.:·b .1~~1.>1'-~Dih-::1.:;2. w-:-.s '-no one of tho parties to the t:~o l'OiJbo:r;y ~ -f~ecl ~ l.'AAo,:cy p0.:r:-potrntod a:li I'.:inyorod, mttor • of. t!1c olinrgo ·.prof'crrcd ::-.f,'nir.ts•:; ·be a.pr1ellant nncl bid ' c ~ Q d • ~Ul.Jr•;Dilt ·a.to :Oft::to.cmit • to tho polico, wb.-ioh: WQ.O 11p:r~odt n:a on ~ b i t by tho prosecutor w!J.011 011.tli1u:1i:/ tho ·fo.ctc of tho O~Q, \o~V'os nq. doubt :wlv1tooovo:r t::1 J~. ·tho 1..;b'.Jory -~ho .·.00UJJ0d· intonclcd '-to p\o:::.d Q,lilty. · of 'WM th2:t c.or.10ittod ot. ~'in.i... -In -~~l'~ course o:( tho a·l;2.tcj:"'..Ont the aocuaocl ac.1.d,- iu · SwchiJ.i a \ ' •. ·1 13/~/C9 ~ 1e:::.r:t s.A.t. '19.00 zt:. ·.~:sr:rn, ~·:.::n 1:n:;r 1TILDCQ1i'.!i. . HY'Ol,'IDIJ·TI HIICTTT..'.. K'.. :i.~D"JCfJ Z!JJ'JU • n:.: SIICTr ~ -r.tn:rr sirroo1;ro1c'.. ~ ~;·_:i~:.:s:... ·n.1 nM.rno :ci ~:.R-:-Jm 14/;/09 rrrm: SIJ:. u,.·.:::.r ICTJJJ'IK:~ TIUKO J.'. ,, .- ,, :;••1 • ' . :_. • :t~

qn,n;.'1o;t bq cliopu·i;od thJ.t whc-.t I 1;.-vo S,::!.id olo2rly do::~pfi,;~ntoa thnl.; i ti-..o-- idarnod n~:i..st:r~to O»I'Qcl :il.1 c~:Lio·bi:13 All; llilungc! of th~. .•.• -- ' 1 .• . • ::5:,3?}';~ ~or:ipittpc\ ?t I>ioy~~~i ,:!~on -~lw ):•ob"b~fY 2::,.Jl'. l.q.. ~~~~---... - o.~~s~u,:; to h':.~o 00:-JDi:i:itc~cl _"!?-° ·c::.G C-110 wl:.ioh he_ vi:q,;;; ,1wt ~lnrgc._4- , • 'lilr~t n?,ooly,i .,t... ,J.., -cl}o.,:r;;u9]ffl"'J' aor.1Lti:~t9C.. c.·~ J u ~ . ..~_•.... ..... • .. lo .., 1 ~, -· ... _".;,·_ ....... I·~-i.fJ t,nj~·b ;to convio:t; q. porou:1 qJ .a·cri::io ho die'. n0t o~t,· ., , l' ;,rqp. ... .i/- •iil::-'.t :;)or:-JGn ~OS 'l.'!.tto:roc1 wo~~ · w'-1io1l nro taken. by ~ ,Co -· thQPJtU1. . ,.,,· .... ~ ~a.r¥3ti.tt\t,.., o.. plo~ .o.f_. g~~Y,r,.,... ..:- ,. - 3 .. bho injustice which Ally Dilungc.. hr:'.JJ 1Joon subjcct9d "co by tho 'cn,or into \"which tho lca!'nod Dogis"i:irnto ot:rnyocl dcr.1onstrat0s; I think, tho ioportanco f:s! tho Jl~cd for a r.ui.gistrato to so;i:;isfy hir:solf not only that tho f aPt--t~d '1~of ore Ho ho.s plca,c1e,l gt.ti.Hy but n.lso th2.t the accuaod has d.0110 so with sufficient knowlo:.go ru1cl tu1.dorstancling. The m:igistrate ol1ot.ild, where noce::mn.ry~ qu0 □ t~ .m -~!10 o.,ccusccl with ~ view to discovering if' he knows thr- Da.ttcro ho is · ;clL::i.11g a,1Jout. A oogistra.to should never forgot that n. p .02. of guilty r:-:zy- 1 fox

miy one of a vn.rioty of 1 ronsons, be wrc:1p.- :- ~ 110 """ · r· • t 0 o,:, fn.ls c • 1-n1on convicting an aPcus od porsont whothe:r.> upon a 1,lort of s, .. ~ ·.J ,Jr not; he s:~onlc1 satisfy hiosolf' that "G thoro is no roo.sonablo ·louM tho..t tho. aocusod is guilty, both in f2.0t a.nd in la.w, of tb . offence in qt·.oG~ion. Ii' 7 in the i11stnnt oo.sc, the lcan10d neg-is·:; rat c hod so c1i l'octcd. him elf'; ho Wvuld not hn.vo treatod Ally s/o Dilt,::ign,ts ploo. as a plea. of gttllty., (lb.being asked whether tho foots givon by the prosecutor ( in which thoro wci8 nc.... cv'on n. shadow of ;;..llo3"c.:!iio11 toot tho acoi1Scd wa.s one of the robbers) wore correct tho acotmed Dc:do rofo:ronco to i:i, spoti.r otab -wound-----.._ ho st1.Stnincd frurJ tho hn.ncl.D of tho vic-~irJ while corn:li tting tho robbery he wns a pa.rty too Thio sk.for.1onJi:; o?.1ould have convoyed a ocso.ogc to tho prosectnor tho.-t tho :;:oobbcry tho c.;JCt1.Sod was n.J.1uding to ~ tho ono pcrpotrn.tod at Tiugu1. un~-~ bocnuoc, 2.000:uing, to 1 thee ovidonoo tho imrcotigc.tion tcan had colloctedj 110 1:1,"i;"tetck on tho :robboro w.a attoopte(l dl..".ring t.'10 Iili-iyorozi robbo1y o Ih r.w opinion 1 tho ovidonoo l::,id in tho sen.lo ngninst the q,ppollUQ.t ill tlu.s cc.so wn.o insUlfi.ficient to jt:.::rcity finding hio guilty ot the o:N'onco ho wnG ch,':'.rgod wit::.. ..woo~lingly, the

n.ppollD.l'.lJG rs conviction \8 gt.1.013had a.nd tho sontonco iopoood -~I:c::coon io oot Q.Gideo Unlooa ho io o·thonri.so lo:wf'ully held in cwtody -~ho i?..ppcllo.nt be set at liberty forthwith. I hn:-ve, I hope,· ov.ffioion-~ly axplcined why tho conviction of Ally Dil~c. for the robbery porpot~a:~od 2.t Kinyorozi cnnnot in ln.w bQ oupportod. Exc:roiaing r.v revi.oiona.l powo:ro 1 I qu.:!.Bh thnt conviotion ru,1d soJG noido ·tho aontooe ir:rpooocl -~;~oroo11 0 Unloso hi □ peroontl froodoo is otherwise lmr.ru.11.y aoocJ.ilad 1 tho <.1.0ct.1ncd be rolcusod froo oua·tody forthwith., For the 1:1,voic~1cc of doubt, it Dust be pointgd out thc.t tho proa.ooi,rtion arc nt libcl'ty in lc1,w to cb."J.rge tho ~ t:JXJ.4/ or th_c o.p:pcllont wi tb. th.o robl:><uzy- c.llcgodly c · l'/G ~~~"\f --- B. • · Tl'A . JAJI 1aomozr ~livered this 30th do..y of' Dccor:ibc:r, 1993, in tho pro2cnoo ot the a,ppo.lla.nt and Nios Ko.huto., oounool for t!J.o Republic. B. k. SIDMTTA .

JAJI KIONGOZI /

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code s. 285

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code s. 286

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.