Dooreach Vs

Dooreach Vs

The court found that the parties had lawfully settled the matter and, in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code, recorded the deed of settlement as a decree of the court, thereby disposing of the application.

Citation
Dooreach Vs
Parties
1st Petitioner: The Attorney General; 2nd Petitioner: Tanzania Airports Authority (TAA); Respondent: Dooreach Group Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause (arbitration) / Consent Judgment
Outcome
Application settled by consent; deed of settlement recorded as decree of the court.
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Settlement Agreements, Consent Judgments
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General

1st Petitioner

Tanzania Airports Authority (TAA)

2nd Petitioner

Dooreach Group Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Cause (arbitration) / Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral award dated 1st September 2023 should be registered and enforced as a decree of the court
  2. 2 Whether the deed of settlement between the parties should be recorded as a consent judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had lawfully settled the matter and, in accordance with the Civil Procedure Code, recorded the deed of settlement as a decree of the court, thereby disposing of the application.

Court Disposition

Application settled by consent; deed of settlement recorded as decree of the court.

Orders

  • Dooreach Group Limited to pay Tanzania Airports Authority USD 4,068 in three installments as full and final settlement of arbitration claims.
  • No interest shall accrue if payment is made as scheduled.