dora peta vs coca cola kwanza ltd 2015 tzhc 2119 17 august 2015
The applicant was within the ninety-day limitation period for filing an appeal when she received the certified copy of the judgment, and her prompt action and reliance on incorrect legal advice constituted sufficient cause for extension of time.
- Citation
- dora peta vs coca cola kwanza ltd 2015 tzhc 2119 17 august 2015
- Parties
- Applicant: Dora Peta; Respondent: Coca Cola Kwanza Ltd
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Limitation Period, Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dora Peta
Applicant
Coca Cola Kwanza Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was within the ninety-day limitation period for filing an appeal when she received the certified copy of the judgment, and her prompt action and reliance on incorrect legal advice constituted sufficient cause for extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant granted 14 days to file appeal
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment