doreen epaphradito massamu vs yetu microfinance bank ltd 2022 tzhcld 1101 13 december 2022
Respondent made employment intolerable by denying salary for six months and access to office, and by requiring withdrawal of dispute as a condition for assignment of duties, amounting to constructive termination. Arbitrator erred in not recognizing this and in rejecting emails as evidence without proper foundation.
- Citation
- doreen epaphradito massamu vs yetu microfinance bank ltd 2022 tzhcld 1101 13 december 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Doreen Epaphradito Massamu; Respondent: Yetu Microfinance Bank PLC
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Revision Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Termination, Unfair Labour Practices, Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Doreen Epaphradito Massamu
Applicant
Yetu Microfinance Bank PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Revision Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent made employment intolerable leading to constructive termination
- 2 Whether the arbitrator erred in rejecting emails as evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Respondent made employment intolerable by denying salary for six months and access to office, and by requiring withdrawal of dispute as a condition for assignment of duties, amounting to constructive termination. Arbitrator erred in not recognizing this and in rejecting emails as evidence without proper foundation.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- CMA award quashed and set aside
- Applicant to be paid TZS 10,286,076/= for 12 months compensation, leave, severance, and notice
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment