dotto shaban kuingwa vs csi engineering co ltd 2020 tzhcld 128 10 july 2020

dotto shaban kuingwa vs csi engineering co ltd 2020 tzhcld 128 10 july 2020

The applicant's contract was a fixed term contract that expired on its stated date. There was no evidence of a reasonable expectation of renewal or that the applicant continued working after expiry. Therefore, the termination was not unfair, and the applicant is not entitled to remedies for unfair termination or additional terminal benefits.

Citation
dotto shaban kuingwa vs csi engineering co ltd 2020 tzhcld 128 10 july 2020
Parties
Applicant: Dotto Shaban Kuingwa; Respondent: CSI Engineering Company Ltd
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Fixed Term Contracts, Unfair Termination, Reasonable Expectation of Renewal, Terminal Benefits
Source Language
English
Labour Law Fixed Term Contracts Unfair Termination Reasonable Expectation of Renewal Terminal Benefits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dotto Shaban Kuingwa

Applicant

CSI Engineering Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a reasonable expectation for the contract of employment of the applicant to be renewed
  2. 2 Whether the respondent unfairly terminated applicant's employment
  3. 3 What remedies are entitled to parties

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's contract was a fixed term contract that expired on its stated date. There was no evidence of a reasonable expectation of renewal or that the applicant continued working after expiry. Therefore, the termination was not unfair, and the applicant is not entitled to remedies for unfair termination or additional terminal benefits.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No remedies or terminal benefits awarded beyond what was already paid by the respondent
  • Arbitrator's award upheld