CIVIL CASE NO
- Citation
- CIVIL CASE NO
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 1 January 2023
- Posture
- Civil Case / Summary Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 1 January 2023
- Posture
- Civil Case / Summary Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Defendant failed to remit statutory contributions and penalties, did not apply for leave to defend, and the Plaintiffs' claims are deemed admitted under summary procedure; judgment is entered for the Plaintiffs for the claimed sums, interest, and costs.
Court disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendant to pay 3,060,995,822.56 Tanzanian Shillings as un-remitted members' contributions plus accumulated penalties.
- Interest at 7% per annum from date of judgment until full satisfaction.
- Plaintiffs to recover costs arising from the suit.
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
1st Plaintiff Counsel: Opio MarcellusThe Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund
2nd Plaintiff Counsel: Opio MarcellusD.P. Shapriya and Company Limited
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Outstanding Principal Members' Contributions: TZS 1,143,536,904
- Accumulated Penalties: TZS 1,926,458,918.56
- Total Judgment Sum: TZS 3,060,995,822.56
- Interest Rate: percent 7
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Case / Summary Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Defendant failed to remit statutory members' contributions as required by law
- 02
Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to recover outstanding contributions and penalties under summary procedure
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Defendant, as a registered employer member, failed to remit statutory contributions and penalties, breaching statutory obligations and denying employees their pension benefits. Plaintiffs demanded payment repeatedly without success and supported their claim with registration certificates, inspection reports, schedules of outstanding contributions and penalties, and demand letters.
- Respondent
- The Defendant was absent and did not file for leave to appear and defend; no arguments presented.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33, R.E 2019
Where no leave to appear and defend is granted in a summary suit, allegations in the Plaint are deemed admitted.
- 02
CRDB Bank Limited vs. John Kagimbo Lwambagaza [2002] TLR 117
Summary procedure enables a Plaintiff to obtain judgment expeditiously where the Defendant has no substantial defense and prevents delaying tactics.
- 03
Paul Massawe & 2 Others Vs. Access Bank Tanzania Limited, Civil Appeal No. 39 of 2014 (Unreported)
Reliefs prayed for in a summary suit must be available under summary procedure and based on written agreement or negotiable instrument.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Defendant failed to remit statutory contributions and penalties, did not apply for leave to defend, and the Plaintiffs' claims are deemed admitted under summary procedure; judgment is entered for the Plaintiffs for the claimed sums, interest, and costs.
Obiter and limits
- The Defendant's failure to remit contributions denies employees their rightful pension benefits.
- Summary suits are designed to prevent defendants from employing delaying tactics.
Court disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs
- Defendant to pay 3,060,995,822.56 Tanzanian Shillings as un-remitted members' contributions plus accumulated penalties.
- Interest at 7% per annum from date of judgment until full satisfaction.
- Plaintiffs to recover costs arising from the suit.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 1 January 2023
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 1 January 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
DAR ES SALAAM SUB REGISTRY
AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 124 OF 2023 ______ ATTORNEY GENERAL …………….…………..…………..….….1ST PLAINTIFF
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND………………………….…………….2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS D.P. SHAPRIYA AND COMPANY LIMITED ………..…………..DEFENDANT
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT Date of last order: 9th October 2024 Date of Judgement: 17th October 2024 MTEMBWA, J.: The Plaintiffs herein, by way of summary procedure under Order XXXV of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33, R.E 2019, instituted this suit against the Defendant for the following orders and I quote in verbatim; (i) The Defendant to be ordered to pay the sum of 3,060,995,822.56 (Tanzanian Shillings Three Billion Sixty Million Nine Hundred Ninety-five Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Two Shillings Fifty-Six Cents); being un-remitted members' contributions plus accumulated penalties once the 1 outstanding amount is settled and charged 5% in each respective delayed month thereon due and payable to the Plaintiffs by the Defendant. (ii) Interest on decretal sum at the prescribed Court rate of 7% per annum from the date of delivery of Judgment until the same shall be fully satisfied; (iii) Costs of this suit and any other incidental costs pertaining to the filing of the suit; and (iv) Any other and further relief as this Honorable Court shall deem fit and just to grant. When the matter came for orders on 9th October 2024, the Plaintiffs were represented by Mr. Opio Marcellus, the learned principal state attorney, while the Defendant was not present. Mr. Marcellus informed this Court that he had information that Misc. Civil Application No. 15673 of 2024 was dismissed for want of
prosecution. Since there was no Application for leave to appear and defend the suit, he implored this Court to pronounce a summary judgment against the Defendant, which I will now give. Before I delve into the crux of the matter, I find it opts to narrate the factual background information leading to this battle as revealed by the Plaint. According to the Plaint, the Defendant is a registered contributing 2 member employer of the 2nd Plaintiff with a Membership Certificate of Registration Number 19690. According to the law establishing the 2nd Plaintiff, the Defendant is required each month to make its compulsory contribution and that of its employees at a 10%/10% rate, respectively, equal to 20% of the (member) employees’ wages. That, despite the fact that Defendant is so obliged in law, she failed, neglected, ignored, and or defaulted to remit the members' statutory contributions to Plaintiff for some of the months and delayed remittance in some of the months, which attracted imposition of the penalty. It was revealed further that, the undesirable act of the Defendant of ignoring, delaying, refusing, neglecting and or defaulting to remit to the Plaintiff the members' contributions not only that it is against the law but also denies her employees (Plaintiff's members) of their rightful pension benefits in the event they retire, die and or when they leave the scheme in any
other manner. The facts reveal further that the Defendant is in breach of its statutory obligations and has defaulted remittance of members' statutory contributions amounting to Tanzanian Shillings 1,143,536,904.00 (Tanzanian Shillings One Billion One Hundred Forty-Three Million Five Hundred Thirty-Six Thousand Nine Hundred Four Shillings) being the outstanding principal members' contributions which covers the 3 period between January 2011 to January 2023 with accumulated penalties amounting to Tanzanian Shillings 1,926,458,918.56 (Tanzanian Shillings One Billion Nine Hundred Twenty-Six Million Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Eighteen Shillings and Fifty-Six Cents only)which shall continue to accrue as long as the amount stand unpaid. As a result of the Defendant's breach and failure to heed its statutory obligations to remit members' statutory contributions, the Plaintiffs demanded performance on numerous occasions without success. To fortify the claimed sum, the Plaintiffs attached to the Plaint the following documents: Copies of the Certificates of Registration and registration details certifying the Defendant's membership with the 2nd Plaintiff; sheets of list of inspection reports, exit meeting reports, schedule of outstanding contributions and penalties and the demand letters by the 2nd Plaintiff addressed to the Defendant. They are deemed to have
been received to form part of the records. It is for these facts the Plaintiffs have advanced the prayers as prefaced above. It is a settled position of the law that where a suit is brought under the summary procedure and where no leave to appear and defend has been granted, the allegations in the Plaint are deemed to have been admitted (See Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code). 4 The objectives of the summary suits were enunciated in the case of CRDB Bank Limited vs. John Kagimbo Lwambagaza [2002] TLR 117, where the Court observed that; The purpose of Order XXXV: Summary Procedure "is to enable a Plaintiff to obtain Judgement expeditiously where the Defendant has in effect no substantial defense to the suit and prevent the Defendant from employing delaying tactics and, in the process, postpone the day of reckoning. I am of the settled view that order XXXV is self-contained in so far as it relates to suits stipulated there-under. Conversely, it is settled that reliefs prayed for in a summary suit must be reliefs available under the summary procedure. In the case of Paul Massawe & 2 Others Vs. Access Bank Tanzania Limited, Civil Appeal No. 39 of 2014 (Unreported) the Court of Appeal quoted the script at page 3311 of Mulla, the Code of Civil Procedure, and observed that; The reliefs prayed for in a summary suit must be reliefs available under summary procedure, that
is based on a written agreement or a negotiable instrument or as otherwise provided by 0. 37 of the code of civil procedure (equivalent to our order XXXV) Having dispassionately considered the above-settled position of the law, annunciated principles, the facts and attached documents as revealed 5 by the records, I hereby, summarily, enter Judgement in favour of the Plaintiffs on the following reliefs; (i) The Defendant to be ordered to pay the sum of 3,060,995,822.56 (Tanzanian Shillings Three Billion Sixty Million Nine Hundred Ninety-five Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Two Shillings Fifty-Six Cents); being un-remitted members' contributions plus accumulated penalties payable to the Plaintiffs by the Defendant. (ii) Interest thereof at the Court’s rate of 7% per annum from the date of delivery of the judgment to the date of full recovery and; (iii) The Plaintiffs shall recover the costs arising from the suit. It is so ordered. Right of appeal explained. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 17th October 2024. H.S. MTEMBWA
JUDGE 6 7
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.